Who has the right to say 911 was an inside job with out being able to prove it, is this sedition or Slander?

Question

Treason, sedition mean disloyalty or treachery to one's country or its government. Treason is any attempt to overthrow the government or impair the well-being of a state to which one owes allegiance; the crime of giving aid or comfort to the enemies of one's government. Sedition is any act, writing, speech, etc., directed unlawfully against state authority, the government, or constitution, or calculated to bring it into contempt or to incite others to hostility, ill will or disaffection; it does not amount to treason and therefore is not a capital offense. 2. See disloyalty.

I am thankful for America and her consitution. We in Canada as in the west in general have one to, in it we have like you free speach.

Answer 1

You make several excellent points.

Unfortunately, there seems to be no fine line anymore between legitimate inquiry into an event and outright accusations.

Suffice it to say that if there was any valid and verifiable facts to the conspiracies presently polluting the Internet, they would be exposed - not by fictional movies, op-blogs and websites, but by independent watch dog groups, independent reporters and authors, the media, the opposition parties and about a bazillion people who were involved and would now be writing their memoirs.
Capital Hill is under a 24/7 microscope. Ask any of the countless, dirt bag politicians who have been exposed for various criminal acts and deviant behavior in the last year or so.

Answer 2

technological awareness does not say God (or gods) do no longer exist - no medical paper makes any declare approximately gods in any admire. No factor of the universe is exterior the scope of technological awareness (inclusive of any gods that could exist), yet subsequently some distance there's no information of any, and no god is had to describe any factor of understood nature. The claims approximately gods are human beings memories in basic terms - a cultural phenomenon. the interior maximum critiques of scientists are thoroughly irrelevant, because it somewhat is ultimate their released technological awareness that has been peer-reviewed. A scientist ought to assume in pixies or the occult, yet i want to advise he'd conflict to locate sufficient information to back up such claims sufficient to get through skill of the peer-assessment approach. same look after gods. None of Einstein's technological awareness claims something approximately gods. Your potential equations have long previous unsuitable - the place did 'd' come from? you appear to be dealing with the Lorentz transformation equation of SR, even however now no longer explaining why. "if I harm the gentle barrier" The Lorentz equation presupposes that the gentle barrier can not be broken, and no edge of classical physics claims that it may. Even quantum mechanics makes no such claims. So it somewhat is a meaningless suggestion. you're using the equation in an invalid attitude. subsequently your innovations of tears and a 'portal' to heaven are good.... Abject nonsense! to no longer beat relating to the bush. I recommend you study up somewhat greater approximately particular Relativity, and probably even some GR too, as your know-how looks deeply improper.

Answer 3

Definitly an Inside Job.
I read alot about 9/11 & saw a video online taken from a show on t.v way before 9/11 saying that it's an inside job. Also, what made alot of jews skip going to thier jobs that same day?? alot of un-understandable things happened "inside the united states" right before that horrible incident.

Answer 4

Since the present White House has been proven, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that they lie to the public, enquiring minds want to know the truth, so they dig for it.

You'd be surprised how many lies you can uncover when you dig for the truth.

Too bad, this White House makes the people dig.

.

Answer 5

Anyone can argue their theory, whatever it is. The United States no longer has a sedition law - it is unAmerican.

Answer 6

yes it is slander. it is what the left is today. a radical hate america group of nutjobs, its why they must be defeated. people with sense need to understand the modern day liberal is nothing like what the democrats used to be.

Answer 7

Actually there are overwhelming evidence that point the finger at Bush and his goons.

Answer 8

Freedom of speech. However, you have to be pretty gullible to think it was an inside job.

Answer 9

Librals can't deal with facts, just feelings!

Answer 10

slander