Already it has been decided whether or not people can smoke...
does anyone care anyway? Incidentally. I never have, but am I starting to notice subtle changes building to a bigger picture?
I am beginning to wonder if all the governments are just as bad, especially if a single government is where we are heading anyway.
2007-01-03 11:25:28 · 9 answers · asked by The Mole 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
We are heading towards a very strange mix of corporatism and stalinism. A wedding between fascism and stalinist communism if you will. I know it sounds bizarre but look at life in the UK. More and more privatisation and corporate cronyism mixed with a strong urge on the part of the state to interfere in every area of our individual lives.
The state is happy for corporations to make their money, so long as the state maintains ultimate control over the population. They want to track and regulate every area of our lives, then sell that information to the highest bidder.
Corporatism and Stalinism combined due to the need to eradicate individuality of individuals and their freedom, but let's not stop them from consuming! It's becoming the worst of both worlds! We are being forced by law to tollerate all the same things, hate all the same things, and become good little complient consumers.
The UK labour party is hoplessly corrupt and we need rid of it.
2007-01-04 02:57:21 · answer #1 · answered by kenhallonthenet 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Labour Party owes more to the Methodist Church than it does to Karl Marx.
Methodists on the whole do not drink or smoke. It is therefore the Methodists within the Labour Party and Movement who are pushing to ban smoking and help drinkers come off their bottles.
2007-01-03 23:52:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes - Blair was a leading member of the Fabians, who favour Socialism into Communism, by stealth.
He's declared his admiration for Karl Marx & states he's in debt to Marx's teachings. Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto.
John Reid, Blair's favourite cabinet member, was head of Britain's Communist Party before Blair's Labour seemed to fit the bill for him.
2007-01-03 11:44:43 · answer #3 · answered by Cracker 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
there's no place left to pass. i do no longer think of distant places troops are going to invade and declare a socialist or communist take over. No we are being betrayed from with in by skill of our very own. bit by skill of bit. all people is going to purely save asserting nicely that little bit isn't nicely worth combating over we are able to win it back on the poll. Oh that little bit does not effect me without postpone so why become in contact. Then at some point there purely isn't all people left that remembers what it grew to become into all approximately at first.
2016-10-29 22:34:48 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No we`re heading back to the feudal system All us common serfs can work from dawn to dusk and think our selves lucky if the Lords of the manor (downing st) leave us with a dry crust to eat after they finish collecting their taxes .
2007-01-03 21:06:48 · answer #5 · answered by keny 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are also becoming very anti-crisp - with adverts about drinking vegetable oil.
Will they make crisps illegal in certain places and make us eat them outside or in other controlled situations?
On the subject of Communism - I don't know that they are apart from the control freakery prevalent in that party.
2007-01-03 23:09:50 · answer #6 · answered by LongJohns 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Labour has its roots in socialism.
Blair is "new labour" which is effectually a split from "old labour"...i.e. Brown and his cronies.
So yes, Labour is experiencing a backlash because of old labour backbenchers who want to restore Labour to its roots.
2007-01-03 11:43:39 · answer #7 · answered by vegetable soup 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We are heading more away from socialism and towards capitalism.
2007-01-03 11:27:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Welcome to the MUSLIM STATE
2007-01-03 11:29:33 · answer #9 · answered by sanjlon 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋