English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Better kill Chávez.

2007-01-03 10:58:35 · answer #1 · answered by Transgénico 7 · 4 1

Don't think there aren't Iranians who are already planning to do just that. He is not very popular there, and assasinations take place regularly in the Middle East.

2007-01-03 19:19:59 · answer #2 · answered by Nels 7 · 2 0

You know, both sides can play that game, but it's not very helpful, just makes people more extreme.

Killing Castro never really came off though, did it?

2007-01-03 19:18:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No, his fellow citizens are just as angry with him as U.S. citizens are with Bush. Ahamdinejad's policies are pushing him out of power. There is no need for us to kill him.

2007-01-03 19:00:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Wouldn't do any good. He's just a puppet.
Besides, if we interfere in any way, the Iranian people will take it the wrong way.

2007-01-03 18:57:49 · answer #5 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 3 1

It would be just as worthwhile as executing Saddam Hussein.

2007-01-03 19:13:21 · answer #6 · answered by wunderkind 4 · 0 1

we should hang him to just for being ignorant

2007-01-03 22:20:21 · answer #7 · answered by Demon_Hunter 2 · 1 0

After all the work our govt did putting him in there??!!!

Oh wait a minute....

2007-01-03 19:03:15 · answer #8 · answered by Melissa Me 7 · 1 2

We say "Terminate with extreme prejidice" and don't worry we are working on it......

2007-01-03 19:04:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Why?

2007-01-03 18:57:58 · answer #10 · answered by Arizona Brit 4 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers