English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Tony was riding his mountain bike along an unmade road. He saw Joan, his former girlfriend, walking with her new boyfriend, Jack. Tony was still upset that Joan had left him for Jack. He went past Joan and Jack as fast as he could, deliberately shouting "Boo" as he went past them. Joan was startled by the shout and jumped into the edge of the road where she slipped and fell into a ditch, suffering bruising. Question is, what's Tony's criminal liability in this case?

2007-01-03 10:30:03 · 12 answers · asked by Georgina 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

12 answers

Listen Carefully:

1- If This road is known that it might cause this accident if someone is frightened, in another words, if the consequences of The Action was forseeable, then the doer "John" Is responsible for "Assault and battery" .. It's exactly like telling a young boy: "Young boys go to heaven when they die, even if you killed yourself.." if the young boy killed himself then, It's a homicide.

2- If the consequences were unexpectable; Like his "BOOO" meant only to bother them, and it's likely that the death wouldn't happen; I. E. If any other person in the victim's situation Would NOT have fallen, then the doer is liable on the civil side, this means he must pay a compensation to the victim. The measurment in this case is called: "The ordinary man" and It's well known that a "Boo" Doesn't cause bruises to an ordinary man. That makes us return to the point of "circumstances", the deadly edge, A BOO may kill a man with a weak heart if the doer knos he's attacking someone having heart diseases. a BOO may cause an injury to someone walking on a dangerous edge.

3- Being in a Judge shoe, I'll hold the doer in this case liable for assault and battery, 'cause "Boo" in this situation meant: "I Knew that "Boo" will cause damage, I wanted inted but with out pre-intention".

2007-01-03 10:48:08 · answer #1 · answered by Lawrence of Arabia 6 · 0 1

maximum of my jobs I even have ever worked at required me to recover from issues that scare me , or that I disgust. I determine I would desire to have a activity, what extra constructive way than to discover one to recover from your fears. I washed canines for like 3 months, frightening factor is, is i grew to become into super afraid of all canines yet my very own when I familiar the activity, love all canines now. I at the instant am a server, and that i HATE germs, I dont use public restrooms, they are crawling with them, yet i like my activity, and that i'm consistently fidgeting with others peoples chewed up foodstuff and messing with germs, I determine i will wash my self up with cleansing soap and water. i used to be incredibly afraid of each and every of the germ issues, the roles helped me understand a tub and many cleansing soap removes diverse issues. the entire getting over my phobias( which maximum individuals does not attempt) has actual helped me lots, do lots extra issues that I wouldnt have b4 And sure, germs nonetheless freak me out!

2016-10-29 22:28:36 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Get a grip Joan....criminal liability for shouting "boo"?...lol. I do not believe there is any "criminal" liability .....perhaps you could sue him in civil court for your pain and suffering.

IMO you should leave Tony alone....sounds like he's suffered enough.

2007-01-03 10:48:28 · answer #3 · answered by kissmybum 4 · 1 1

He did cause injury, and therfore he is liable for any damages. Sounds like if she just had some bruising, isn't to serious. If she seeks medical treatment, he is liable for the costs of medical services, although she would have to take him to small claims court for reimbursment. small claims doesn't require a lawyer.

2007-01-03 11:04:02 · answer #4 · answered by joloinaz 2 · 0 1

Umm, none. The most it could be was something along the lines of harassment with intent to harm. I don't know the official legal term for something like that, but that might be close.

2007-01-03 10:34:33 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 1 2

Simple assault. Possibly. Certainly there is potential tort liability.

2007-01-03 10:35:26 · answer #6 · answered by mattapan26 7 · 0 1

Only in America could someone be sued for something so asinine!

2007-01-03 10:41:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Sounds like a form of assault to me.

2007-01-03 10:33:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Nothing.

2007-01-03 10:34:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

100%, cause and effect.

2007-01-03 10:34:25 · answer #10 · answered by Conrey 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers