Which sentence is better (proper sentence structure, punctuation, grammar) out of these two?

Question

1)If the Packers made the playoffs, how far would they go?

2)How far would the Packers go if they made the playoffs?

Which one sounds better? Are they both acceptable?

Answer 1

I prefer sentence one. It makes it into a complex sentences.

If the Packers made it into the playoffs, how far would they go?

Answer 2

I think both are acceptable, but I like sentence 1 better because it presents the situation you are asking about first, *before* asking the actual question. It gives the listener or reader a chance to realize, "OK, I'm going to be asked or told something about the Packers in the playoffs...", so it "sets the stage" for your question, if you will.

Answer 3

1 is better;number 2 is grammatically incorrect
2. How far would the Packers go if they had made the playoffs?

Answer 4

I think 1 is better if it's a headline banner on a newspaper. more catchy i mean the possibility of the packers making the playoffs is posed at the reader then the question of how far they would go.
# 2 posed you a question first how far then only if.
ah you're making me think in so early am. enough.

Answer 5

I see no grammatical issues in either, but prefer the second. But the first is quite acceptable, and ultimately I suppose that I would choose depending on context.

Answer 6

in uncomplicated terms a word that interior the yank punctuation equipment, the comma continually is going interior the citation marks, so female Morgana is stable. interior the British equipment, the comma can bypass outdoors the citation marks if it logically belongs there. however the question mark via definition ends that sentence, so which you're able to desire to start a sparkling one.

Answer 7

#1 is correct from an English teacher's point of view, but in casual language, both are acceptable.
-Zeldafreak

Answer 8

#1 is better, but in everyday use you could probably get away with using both.

Answer 9

either or