2007-01-03 07:59:22 · 19 answers · asked by Isuck,Usuck,Weallsuck 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
considering im a person of faith, i would not let him go. This is because i truly believe that wrong is wrong, and right is right, and to let him go is wrong (even if he didnt knock down the towers), and that if i let him go, God will take the 1 billion dollars or my life away.
2007-01-03 08:04:04 · update #1
i know i sounded extreme right there, but ive been taught that good things come to those who do good, and bad things come to those who do bad. think of all the good that would come to capturing him and not letting him go:
-global hero
-$$ award
-good points with god
-can find out the truth about 9-11 (did osama do it or did bush do it or were they two parts of the same seven headed dragon)
2007-01-03 08:06:39 · update #2
No way. Would a billion dollars console you when he keeps murdering people?
Besides, doesn't he have a pretty big bounty on his head? Don't be greedy!
2007-01-03 08:05:39 · answer #1 · answered by Jadis 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No I wouldn't take it and here is why....
The current bounty on Osama Bin Ladens head is $50 million dollars. And it's $25 million just for information to help the government to capture him. Sure 1 billion is more than $50 million but if you were to catch him and simply release him for 1 billion dollars first of all, The government may track down the money trail as someone like me making about $30,000. a year and not a lottery player with no real inheritance all of a sudden becoming a billionaire is extremely questional at best. Also, if you were to catch him and let him go, what is to stop him from killing you? Some more down falls to this is that if ANYONE ever found out they'd probably charge you with treason not to mention you'd probably be the least liked american in the US and people would want to kill you. Your best bet would be to turn him in, take the $50 million and accept that and your name being written in history as being the "civilian" to capture a mass murder who has committed crimes against humanity as enough prize.
2007-01-03 08:32:26 · answer #2 · answered by ♥Rayah♥ 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No because I do believe there is an award for his capture, it might not be as much but I don't need a billion dollars anyways.
2007-01-03 08:03:19 · answer #3 · answered by evildragon1952 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
hell ! no why would i release someone who was endangering the free world after i finally captured him second like he would have that kind of money on him and if he didnt have it on him you let him go and he would just third by then i would have already blown his brains out fourth and last why would i take something material for freeing him when if i captured him and took him to athoritities and killed many more people would breath with ease
2007-01-03 08:16:28 · answer #4 · answered by beatyfabolus67678589 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I would turn him in or I would be aiding and abetting a fugitive which is against the law. I wouldn't risk prison for that piece of trash and his filthy money.
2007-01-03 08:10:45 · answer #5 · answered by Debra D 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes I would let him go. I would happily take his money .... then shoot him in the back as he walks away.
2007-01-03 08:20:01 · answer #6 · answered by jpfnz 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Definitely.
2007-01-03 08:01:43 · answer #7 · answered by Amanda 6 · 0⤊ 5⤋
No I would not. If I captured him, he wouldn't be going anywhere.
2007-01-03 08:18:16 · answer #8 · answered by Dr. Quest 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I would take the money as cash, then turn him in.
He is a terrorist, you don't have to keep your word to terrorists or arabs and he is both.
People have more of an obligation to an animal than they do to them.
2007-01-03 08:08:46 · answer #9 · answered by bluto blutarsky2 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Then that would mean I had a weapon on me and I'd use it on him. Last thing he would see was a big smile on my face.
2007-01-03 08:06:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋