With the U.S. catching Sadam then turning him over to Iraq, has the U.S. now included Bounty Hunting as the new game plan? Why didn't we try Sadam, isn't that why we supposedly entered Iraq to call him on terrorist activity in the U.S.? Oh, how much reward did we get from Iraq?
2007-01-03 06:43:17 · 4 answers · asked by edubya 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Oh yea, Sadam didn't have terrorist in shelter. The administration was only "aware" of his stock pile of world destructive arsenal. It's all clear now...
2007-01-03 06:56:11 · update #1
Oh NO! I just got a view of this admin. poltical campaign looking like a 'Dog The Bounty Hunter' advertisement! Too fitting...as far as the question, we need to be very clear from here on out what our objectives are when we invade a country, and that those objectives won't include 'bounty hunting' or 'nation building' or 'babysitting civil wars'
2007-01-03 06:53:25 · answer #1 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Saddam was WMD & that crap. Bin Ladin attacked the US(9/11)
Did you just come out of a very extended coma? His mock trial, totally illegal was carried out by US lackies. Saddam was held by US forces until his execution.
2007-01-03 06:49:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Saddam needed to be killed quickly to hide secrets he holds against people in our government.
2007-01-03 06:46:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
if thats the case we need to resume finding Osama and settling what we tried to start.
2007-01-03 06:46:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋