A general says there would've been differences on many levels. What say you?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070103/ts_nm/iraq_dc_99
2007-01-03 06:25:21 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
First, he would have been imprisoned for 15 years for the appeals process.
Second, we would have gave him a lethal injection... twice, because the first time would have been botched and he would not have died.
Otherwise, little difference. Ultimately he would have died, and little would have changed as a result.
2007-01-03 06:34:52 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It would have been the center of a new reality show called:
"who wants to be an executioner" in which contestants competed in various games related to executing prisoners win a chance to hang saddam.
2007-01-03 08:29:02 · answer #2 · answered by bluto blutarsky2 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He would be in prison a long time before he would be executed. Also, he wouldn't have been hung, he would have gotten a lethal injection or the chair.
2007-01-03 06:44:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
he could have been injected with the mussle relaxer that quickly kills you, there are many things that could have been done, he was in U.S custody and the U.S was with him until the point of being brought in for execution.....
2007-01-03 06:39:20 · answer #4 · answered by Snuggle_puffs 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He'd have been on death row for years, and , depending on the state he was held in, could have appeal after appeal.
2007-01-03 06:33:21 · answer #5 · answered by By Your Command 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There would be a LOT more outrage directed to the US - flag burnings, protests, bombings..
2007-01-03 06:33:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
he would have been in custody for about ten years before our slow system would have executed him.
2007-01-03 06:27:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
he would have had endless appeals till he died.
2007-01-03 14:27:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋