English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-03 06:19:42 · 9 answers · asked by Holbrook 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Once again people are failing to see my sarcasm...may be over some people's heads...You see this question on here about Bush about 1000 times a day...if there is no evidence to convict Billy boy, then there is none on Bush too...Liberals need to lighten up...if you are not rich the Clintons hate you....

2007-01-03 06:39:00 · update #1

9 answers

Bill Clinton had the chance to eliminate Bin Ladin, he was under observation and the military was calling to get authorization to terminate him but Bill Clinton said no.

2007-01-03 06:57:53 · answer #1 · answered by crazyhorse19682003 3 · 0 2

I know this may come as a shock, but Bill Clinton isn't in office any longer. So he can't very well derelict a duty he no longer has. We also can't realistically blame him for problems we are having 6 years later.

You need to look at our current President if you are having issues with Duties you feel are not be taken care of properly.

2007-01-03 14:33:10 · answer #2 · answered by Tauna H 2 · 0 0

Bill Clinton did nothing, but G. Bush must be impeached now. He did play with all americans in the bad way

2007-01-03 14:36:59 · answer #3 · answered by Sudamérica Puede 4 · 1 0

Derelictin of duty?? You mean when he was being tried on his witch hunt!! Yep he was to busy answering for his action. Where as President Bush refused to answer any questions about 9/11 under oath.
NO we see the truth! Do you?

2007-01-03 14:47:02 · answer #4 · answered by wondermom 6 · 1 0

now there's a thought even if it were tongue in cheek....and you're right if you're not rich the clintons want nothing to do with you...they are the epitome of elitists

2007-01-03 15:12:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well which duty? if egregious enough, sure.
But I suspect that Bush is far more vulnerable to that charge

2007-01-03 14:27:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes, but not by the neck. Let the offending party be punished.

2007-01-03 14:22:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Thank God he lives in America. We don't punish those in power.

2007-01-03 14:28:06 · answer #8 · answered by kiki 4 · 0 0

Tell me please. Did Clinton's lie about no sex cause 3000 soldiers to die?

2007-01-03 14:43:03 · answer #9 · answered by Lou 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers