I have yet to hear a key Democrat say otherwise.
2007-01-03 06:08:00 · 11 answers · asked by junglejoe 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
YOU make it seem as though Dubya was out looking with a flashlight in one hand and a penknife in the other hand for Saddam. It's so easy to sit back and give orders and when something doesn't work, blame someone else... 3,000 of our enlisted have lost their lives and neither Bush nor Prick Cheney have attended at least ONE funeral! Meanwhile, Prick Cheney's cronies and Dubya's cronies are amassing fortunes by profiteering at the expense of the war... like ghouls! The war is not over. Dubya's and Prick Cheney's cronies are still amassing huge fortunes by ridiculously overcharging the government, and no one is even questioning what is being charged or paid out... $45 for a 6-pack of Pepsi... but OUR men and women are risking their very lives overseas... what's there to be "thankful" about? Our elderly, retired, disabled and poor are living in substandard homes, having to decide whether to buy medicines or food and our super-rich are worried over what they should have for dessert or what new luxury to buy for their pets! Our poor, our elderly, our retired and our disabled are still paying more for their medications than Canadians, Mexicans and Philippinos... WHAT is there to be "thankful" over? Our enlisted are returning home to find they've lost their jobs, or are losing their homes or are facing bankruptcy... or can't get their government cheques on time... or are not getting it at all... WHAT is there to be "thankful" over? Our educational system is in ruins, our inner cities are facing all-time crime records... you think that's something to be thankful over? Oh, yeah, Saddam's two murderous sons were killed in a bloody gun-battle, Saddam was hanged by his own people after he was captured and handed over for trail and execution, along with two of his half-brothers that will swing in a matter of days... and we've lost 3,000 of our enlisted and a little over 16,300 have died in the shootouts and bombings... and who knows how many men, women are children are now disabled and homeless with no one to care for them... Is that something to be thankful for?
2007-01-03 07:21:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A M E N!! Any Key Democrat Will Never Say Anything,
because of their dislike for President Bush.
2007-01-03 06:11:46 · answer #2 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They won't say anything because they aren't on Saddam's side, but they certainly won't support the President.
Regardless of how many WMD's we found there (and we did find some, just not the huge landfall we expected), the completion of the first Gulf War after Saddam repeatedly violated the ceasefire cannot reasonably be considered illegal or unjust...
2007-01-03 06:24:42 · answer #3 · answered by C D 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nicely pondering he grew to become into extremely conservative no longer likely, an more suitable question could be are Republicans offended that Bush have been given rid of Saddam? the guy who grew to become into in potential grew to become right into a socialist who hated u . s . of america and if what Republicans say approximately Democrats grew to become into genuine then that guy could be genuine up their alley, however the united statesA. positioned the conservative religious Saddam in potential with the aid of a coup.
2016-11-26 00:59:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why?
Saddam wasn't behind 911.
And Saddam was not planning to attack American cities with chemical/bio/nerve agents.....not to mention nukes.
And Saddam was not pals with bin Laden.
If anything ....we did bin Laden a favor by removing Saddam from power.
Dubya wanted to invade Iraq BEFORE 911.
You don't believe the governments BS ...do you?
2007-01-03 06:28:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why? Do you think that now he is dead, it's the magic ticket to peace in Iraq?
Geezus! You Righties don't have a clue as to what's really going on over there do you?
The Saddam hanging will NOT settle things down over there, if anything it'll fire them up more.
Saddam was fully contained and we all know that now.
Here's a factual shocker for you Righties....Saddam had NOTHING to do with 9/11.
So, tell us all, why the hell are we there?
He had no WMD's since the first Gulf War.
And don't even try and say "he killed his own people", who gave him those chemicals? Does the name Rumsfeld ring a bell? How about Reagan or G.H.W Bush?
2007-01-03 06:16:53 · answer #6 · answered by Tyrone Shoelaces 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Your not going to hear anything because to do so means to say Bush did the right thing. So they opt to say nothing at all.
2007-01-03 06:13:51 · answer #7 · answered by Q-burt 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, we have lost 3000 soldiers so Bush could win this pssing contest and assure his family's safety. I have not heard one repug talk about that. Guess they know Saddam was telling the truth when he said there were no WMD. Georgie knew he was telling the truth but that was not his motive. Now was it?
2007-01-03 06:14:10 · answer #8 · answered by Lou 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
1out of billion sickos gone, what great progress!
2007-01-03 06:45:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
yeah finally he is gone
2007-01-03 06:11:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋