The urn should stay in whichever country has won it. It is in Australia now, it should stay here. If the MCC wants it back, all they have to do is beat us in a Test series. What could be easier?
2007-01-03 10:24:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by tentofield 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
While logically the Ashes Urn should be given to the team which win the series, the Ashes Urn is not being given to any team due to following reasons:
1) The Ashes Urn was presented to England Captain Ivo
Bligh Melbourne Women during England's 1882-83
tour.
2) Ivo Bligh considered the Urn as a personal gift to him
and handed over to MCC for keeping in MCC Museum
3) The practice being followed since 1998-99 Ashes series is
that a Waterford crystal representation of the urn has been
presented to the winners as the official trophy of the series.
amnd the Original Urn is always kept in MCC Museum
and never given to any team.
2007-01-03 16:04:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Go Aussies I'm only 12 but i'm the only girl i know thats my age that follows cricket!! My Fave Cricketter is Michael Clarke But anyway
My family and i all support cricket we say If the English take the Ashes back well beat again nd again nd again. I think that we should keep the ashes because We rule no matter what!! my mum says that the aussie team are gappier then evr because they lost the ashes but won them back again so it makes them happier!!! Aussie Aussie Aussie Oi Oi Oi
2007-01-03 14:47:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by KrystalKlear 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well you could argue that as Australia never declared independence it doesn't matter where they go, or still, that as they weren't owned by Australia before they were burnt, technically they remain the property of the owner.
It doesn't make much sense on a competition level, but then not many traditions do.
2007-01-03 06:12:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It will bcaz the ashes winner are the world best team.They will retain this time as they have it last time and shows the difference that is clear
2007-01-03 06:19:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by bravo 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes it should remain in Australia..
2007-01-03 11:25:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes
2007-01-03 16:47:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by john 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
They should remain with the owner
2007-01-03 06:52:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by akband 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
They will be forever there if we carry on playing like this tour.
2007-01-03 06:07:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by richard_beckham2001 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
ahhhh let the poms have them, stops them whinging, and who really cares anyway
2007-01-03 10:25:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Stevey 1
·
0⤊
0⤋