2007-01-03 05:54:37 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, but I really dont think he has a chance.....I would want someone with more experience, and knowlege with a vast spectrum of problem solving.
2007-01-03 06:00:00 · answer #1 · answered by AD 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it will hurt his chances. I'm not sure if it should or not, but there are many other better reasons that he shouldn't be elected. Regardless of whether you agree with his political platform, his lack of experience and understanding of the global situation should disqualify him from the highest office in the country. If he served in his national office for a couple more terms, or served as a governor or even in a high level in the private sector, then he might be qualified.
Someone completely unqualified for the job would be worse than Jimmy Carter as President, and everyone should know how disastrous his single term was for the military, foreign policy and domestic issues...
2007-01-03 06:07:27 · answer #2 · answered by C D 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mitt the turn flop is a tax dogger and purely will pay 12% of taxes together as the american human beings pay 24% so what does that inform you, u . s . a . of america is off extra constructive with the present President. Presidnet Obama, Mitt is a valueless reason, if he would have been elected many unfavourable issues would have got here approximately to the 40 seven% remark he made. SO who ever made up the submit of no longer desiring President Obama as Presidnet somewhat than this sorry piece of Caca Mitt the turn flop I sure to variety.
2016-10-29 21:57:13 · answer #3 · answered by hinch 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It shouldn't, but it might. If he gets the nomination then right wing radio will pull out all stops to prevent him from being elected. If they have to create a subconscious connection between the democratic candidate and Saddam Hussein then they will. They were far less subtle in the recent congressional election.
2007-01-03 05:59:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only if the ignorant people continue to judge a person by their name...then again Dick and Bush were elected twice...so Obama may have a clear shot.
2007-01-03 05:58:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm not as concerned about his name as his propensity to give illegal aliens and their supporters all kinds of benefits. I don't think I'd like someone who is not loyal to the citizens and the Constitution to be President of the United States of America. Treason is not a presidential qualification.
2007-01-03 05:59:25 · answer #6 · answered by MH/Citizens Protecting Rights! 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
As much as I would like to say no, the fact is, his name will have a negative impact on his chances of becoming elected.
2007-01-03 05:58:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I hope with every fiber of my being that the majority of Americans are not simpletons who think his middle name indicates anything but his parents bad taste.
2007-01-03 05:57:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
If there are people out there silly enough to vote for somebody based on their name and not their political stance and/or merit, they should not be voting.
2007-01-03 06:00:40 · answer #9 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only if morons continue to distort his name.
They guy is from African descent (if I remember correctly). Get a clue people.
2007-01-03 05:56:18 · answer #10 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋