English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-03 05:51:42 · 4 answers · asked by THE MASTER!! 1 in Politics & Government Elections

4 answers

Why not, Or a businessman, a wrestler, or even a former Actor. I am for WHOEVER can do the best job. And I personially do not give a hoot if it is a republican, democrat, independent, or wig...

maybe thats how EVERYONE should vote instead of voting for the team.

2007-01-03 06:06:28 · answer #1 · answered by Common Sense 5 · 0 0

I don't know that anyone has ever gone from mayor to president without holding some office in between.

Rudy Guiliani comes to mind. He governed a big city effectively - the difference in eight years was remarkable.

I personally think he should have run for either Governor or Senator in NY in 2006. He would have had a real chance.

I do not think he has a very high likelyhood of being nominated for president.

2007-01-03 05:55:43 · answer #2 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0 0

Definitely. It's a really complicated job, and it's all in the Mayor's hands. Probably, few mayors are chosen because those who control the nomination don't want anyone with such proven and independent strength and ability.

2007-01-03 06:01:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There are no qualifications beyond being a US citizen and an age requirement (35?).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States#Requirements_for_holding_office

2007-01-03 05:56:07 · answer #4 · answered by Phoenix, Wise Guru 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers