Perhaps the judges should also be siamese as well.
2007-01-03 03:47:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
On a case by case basis. This is only a theory but the prosecution would have to also prove whether or not the conjoined was an accessory to the fact or did the conjoined attempt to physically stop the accused.
2007-01-03 03:52:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Huey from Ohio 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There never has been such a crime. Both would be complicit anyway - unless one overpowered the other. But Siamese twins have such horrendous medical problems, it would be difficult for them to commit a crime in the first place.
2007-01-03 03:45:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Well--if the 'innocent' one didn't stop the other, they'd technically be an accomplice--so they'd both get in trouble. The problem is gonna come up when one is eligible to get out and the other isn't.
Hmmm......
2007-01-03 03:45:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by kathylouisehall 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
itis a difficult question. I think it belong how one commit crime and how other do to prevent, constrain crime.
2007-01-03 03:57:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by blue sky 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe...if right handed, the right one is the perp and the left one the accomplice...if left handed, the opposite...LOL
2007-01-03 03:50:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they are both guilty
the one you call innocent is at the very least an accessory
2007-01-03 03:45:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by ken y 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
One would be the other's accomplice, so they would both go to jail. LOL
2007-01-03 03:51:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by severina418 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think that's ever been a problem
2007-01-03 03:44:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by babydruz 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
that is a great question... probably both will be charged.
2007-01-03 03:50:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by xander 5
·
0⤊
0⤋