Are You One Of The Astute Few Who Have Discovered The Source Of G. Bush's Political Agenda???

Question

Obviously George W. Bush does not have this degree of intelligence (or any degree), so understand that "W" is a proxy for the neoconservative establishment (who are lobbying for regime change in nearly every Non-Western Country). Also understand how fragile a democracy is and how easy it can be manipulated (especially with television). The source is a book written in 1864 by Maurice Joly entitled "The Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesque". It's a clever dialogue explaining how a democracy can easily be transformed into a dictatorship without the citizenry being aware. At the time of the writing, this very transformation was occurring in France by the tyrant-to-be, Louis Napoleon III. Joly was one of a few to recognize it, so he wrote this book to explain how Louis was doing it. It turned out to be a blueprint, or manual for dictators and was used by Hitler and now by Bush (as a proxy).

All you need, Joly says, is a terror event, a handy enemy against whom the public can be easily incited, and a fascist posing as the people's savior! ANY BODY RECOGNIZE THIS??? Joly had inadvertently created a blueprint for the most dangerous theories and tactics, which would actually contribute to the most heinous crimes agaainst humanityh to be perpetrated in the next century!!!!!!!! AND WE KNOW THAT AMERICA HAS FALLEN VICTIM SINCE 9/11 WAS OBVIOUSLY A FALSE FLAG ATTACK. Osama is the handy enemy, AND, bush continues to play the "Jesus" card!!! Terror...Lies...and Bribery...Unfortunately, as scholars have pointed out, the public does not possess the tools to judge the lie (as many answers below will demonstrate).

Yep, looks like I've hit a nerve with the guilty folks who are posing as Yahoo responders. The last thing they want you to do is to read this book. I found the info on how the press is controlled to be the most fascinating. The neocons are mirroring this manual!!

Answer 1

Thanks for the reference of Maurice Joly. I have found a rather reckless use of the term "democracy" contributing to misinformed perceptions as to what it really means. The US is considered "a republic", which, while democratic in basic principles, is a representative government. That said, I have often wondered about the undue influence big-business has on world governments, especially those plummetting full-throttle to a world economy. Businesses thrive in a democratic environment; even more in an environment that allows them to "corner their market." Hence, an agreement that Shrub is another pawn merely furthering this agenda. With lobbyists helping pave the way, who's to say that democracy (as we hoped it used to be) is not becoming some quaint but vestigial practice thrown to the masses like so many table scraps from those who have already ensured a self-serving outcome: the coralling of a passive, compliant world consumer.

Answer 2

Yes, in answer to your question. You make a very good point, here, especially in respect to the "false flag attack" and television. It makes me sick how Pavlovian the citizens of our country have become but it was obvious from the time of the first Bush president that media, government, oil, all interchangeable these days, as well as car manufacturers and the money markets lined up behind a well orchestrated plan to bring about the big Iraq move to "free its people from tyranny".
My pet peeves are 1.How fuel economy and efficiency began to drop off following the OJ Simpson trial (salivating media) and Gulf War and the now obvious links between the Bush's and Saudi oil, weapons manufacturing, others. While gas prices rose, people, following the examples of "important figures" in the glass teat, fell in line to buy the Hummers and the big SUVs to look like their heroes. Even Hondas gas effeciency went down but most didn't and still don't care, but I'm not surprised. Americans can afford it, right? 2. The War on Terrorism. You can't fight a war against the random mad bomber or angry individual, let alone a certain race or religion. You can't fight a war on terrorism without some sort of science fiction brain implant that's hooked to Big Brother's mainframe.
Let's face it, before long people will do whatever the TV says, believe whatever our President says and you and I and other dissenters will be labeled as Terrorists. Next thing I expect is to see school kids being taught from commercial TV programs...oh wait, they already are!

Answer 3

Actually, if you read the constitution like a lawyer, we are never really given any of our rights. Articles 5, 8 and 10 say things to the effect that the government can just decide to take our rights away, and since the constitution can be amended and interpreted, we're really not guaranteed anything by it.

I don't know where you get this idea that W is lobbying for regime change in every Middle Eastern country, there's a lot of countries out there and only 2 that we've attempted since he's been in office (Arfghanistan and Iraq).

I also don't know where you get the idea that we're in a dictatorship. Comparing Bush to Hitler or Napoleon is like comparing apples to oranges. If it was a dictatorship, why would Bush allow the media to broadcast suicide bombers, the lack of WMD, etc... Why would he allow the democrats to win the house and senate?

Answer 4

amazing is all i an say. it really is hard to believe that there are citizens out there in America who don't get this! He is,as the South American President put it:"The d....himself" Due to censorship, and tapping I hesitate actually putting more down....At one time, I would not have feared retribution, but today, who knows? It is frightening, how shallow some are, their thoughts not reaching beyond what is reported on the boob tube. Open your eyes, use that thing between your ears, and look at the havoc caused, the lives sacrificed, the trust and respect lost by ONE individual for a whole country, our rights and liberties stolen. God help us. He scares me. Amazing what money can buy, freedom for a murderer, ("If I did do it" by O.J.), and the Oval Office for an incompetent. Do you also have trouble believing millions were murdered by the last Dictator? Think.

P.S. I will look up the Jolly book. Thanks!

Answer 5

While you consider yourself astute, I say you are fool, that has fallen for a conspiracy theory that is based in either propaganda, misunderstanding of scientific analysis, or outright lies. You can thank Micheal Moore, Alex Jones, Steve Jones, and the producers of Loose Change for the corruption of your soul. And, I suspect, a liberal university environment.

Or perhaps you were just an idiot to begin with.

What I find interesting about Conspiracy theories is the layering of mythology. People present a "theory" based in speculation, not scientific analysis and probability, and other people refute the myth. So the original "theory" is altered to show that either the counter-argument is flawed or the people are part of the conspiracy. So the people refute the alteration to the original myth. And it continues.

protocols is a master of the myth. He implies that people who refute the myth are either:
1)Too ignorant to look at both sides and come to an opinion, because they are duped by the vast government controlled media, meanwhile he and a few select others have miraculously found the truth.
2)Part of the conspiracy, and would limit the access to his material that proves his myth.

He purposefully fails to acknowledge other options.

That some people don't believe him on instinctive level. And that some people, like me, have looked at his material with an open mind, looked at the counter argument with an open mind, and realized that the original myth is wrong. In order for his myth to be plausible, people would have had to planned this travesty out to an unbelievable level of detail. Or is that the next layer to the myth? That we all are part of the conspiracy. Including protocols.

Or maybe it is just desperation to call people here part of the conspiracy.

Answer 6

There's no doubt Bush manipulated the American people through
fear after 9/11 to pursue his own agenda. He's used that fear to
begin laying the foundation to make America a police state as well
as to deceive the people into supporting a war of aggression in
the Middle East. Using WMDs as an excuse,he removed Saddam
from power in a bid to make Iraq a U.S. ally and gain control of
Iraqi oil-a plan that's doomed to failure.

Answer 7

AIPAC/PNAC are the sources of this administration's agendas. Those books may be partially responsible for the designs, but the intentions come from PNAC. They were the ones who called for "a new Pearl Harbor".

Answer 8

1. You are a bald face liar. Bush has degrees from Yale and Harvard. U = high school dropout

2. 9/11 definitively shown as Muslim terrorist attack, U = wearing tinfoilhat taking drugs to function in polite society.

3. 1864, there was no TV, I can't believe I had to just tell you that.

4. Yes, the old tired Bush = dictator. Suck it up and go back to your dead-end job flipping burgers. Okay!

Answer 9

I actually think its "The project for the New American Century" Written by the Neocons (Cheny, Wolfowitz Pearle Ashcroft ect)

Answer 10

Well like hitler, Bush has consistantly used fear tactics, illogical blind patrotism, predjudice, and divine right ("god wants me to invade Iraq") to drown out his entire incompetence.