Yes, it will survive. But the way things are going, based upon the comments in this forum alone, I think the US will limp along for many years to come. So much hatred for one another within the same country. And for what reason? Because one group does not agree with the other's political leanings. Is that a good reason for hatred? I wouldn't have thought so, but apparently it is sufficient reason in the Greatest Nation in the World! Perhaps the US should take stock internally, before going out to 'save' other nations from internal strife...
2007-01-03 06:05:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Super Ruper 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
We survived 1812 when the British burned the White House.
We survived the civil war (can it be more partisan than that?)
and we survived WW II when two continents and almost 1/2 of the world's GDP were entirely in the hands of our very organized enemies and our military was only a fraction of what it is today.
9/11 was a terrible horrible tragedy and a tremendous shock to our safe secure selves (and our ideas of global American dominance,) but it and all the terrorists in the world have never posed a serious threat to our "survival." The war in Iraq has done far more real and material damage to this nation than 9/11.
Which is why the liberties (no pun intended) that the Bush administration has taken with our ideals, constitution and rights are all the more obscene.
Partisanship, opposition, conflict, dissent, resistance, antagonism and argument are bedrock principles of our democracy. It is only against the anvil of opposition that every theory, presumption and supposition is tested. It was that very partisanship that was missing in action back in 2002 that allowed our leaders' unchecked hubris to lead us into the fiasco that we now find ourselves.
I wanted to add a passage from a Walker Percy novel called 'The Moviegoer" that I just happened to be reading.
"Though I do not know whether I am a liberal or a conservative, I am nevertheless enlivened by the hatred which one bears the other. In fact, this hatred strikes me as one of the few signs of life remaining in the world."
--This was written in 1960, so don't think partisanship is anything new.
2007-01-03 03:35:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Patienttraffic 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
The United States has always been divided by partisan politics. This goes all the way back to the revolutionary beginnings of the country. We always believe that we live in the most extraordinary and dire of times. This nation has faced great divides through it's history which have threatened to tear us apart, but when the need arises we find a way to pull together for the common good.
2007-01-03 03:01:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bryan 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Yes, our bipartisan nation has withstand attacks in World War 2 and for over a hundred years we have been. The National-Union is built on the idea of fighting citizens' agitation with the law and progess within the government to cooperate on their behalf as politicians, http://www.voteprimous.com
2007-01-03 05:54:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes. The myth that the world changed on 9/11 is a big one. The fact is only that on 9/11 we got a wake up call. There were no more Muslims wishing our deaths on 9/11 than on 9/10 (in fact, you could say there 19 fewer).
2007-01-03 03:08:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by kingstubborn 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
you have posed the suited question in right here in a protracted time. This next President is going to stand the cruelest 4 12 months era considering the fact that Washington had the activity. a million. This President coming, has no threat to mis-step. 2. This President would be required to place extra troops in harms way. This combat won't be able to lead to Iraq, i do no longer care if we pull all people out serving there. This combat will stick to them homestead. 3. The lid has been blown off the preverbial can,, we are in contact in a Holy conflict With the Islamic fundamentalist. And If we don't take steps to end this conflict Militarly we can be in a conflict for our very exsistence around the worldwide and right here at homestead. 4. it is incredibly not the time for some ex first woman who thinks she is acquainted with a minimum of a few thing, whilst she is acquainted with precisely no longer something, This lady touts 35 years experience, ok has all people obtainable asked her DOING WHAT. for the period of what volume of time, and attaining what for whom.,.,Documented and shown by skill of a disenterested third occasion, no longer some occasion line hack or her spewing rhetoric... NO i think of no longer,, and she or he will't take care of that scrutiny. 5. Obama super guy, nicely spoken..... No experience, hasn't run a automobile wash sale, hasn't run something, Hasn't performed something, Screw his damn colour has no longer something to do together with his non-ability to run this u . s . in harsh circumstances. 6. John McCain,, reliable guy , great Patriot, Has experience in distant places Affairs, John would be one plausable determination, 7. Mitt Romney,, won't be able to stand somebody throwing funds around to purchase an workplace, 8. Huckabee,,, scarry whilst it comes right down to his stand on protecting faith seperate from state. 9.we've rather lots run the table right here,, Whats extra on the subject of than something, we can would desire to settle returned for whom %. and particular pastime have spoon fed us returned. i'd be gentle with McCain/Thompson McCain/Gulliani McCain/Hunter. If we wish u . s . a . of america to nonetheless be status previous the subsequent 4 years it incredibly is the blend which would be certain have been nonetheless right here,
2016-10-29 21:46:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We have always "survived", and there are those who WILL put aside the differences and pull together, but you have a few who won't, those who only work to further their agenda and care for nothing else ...
I guess I am wondering if we will thrive? Will we look weak to other nations?
It is up to those in leadership to come together for the common cause of this Great Nation.
2007-01-03 03:06:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by jamocha 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes. It is the American way to agree to disagree. I think there is always the "divided parties", but it is more evident now due to the happenings in the world. Basically, I think people are speaking up now to save their votes. . .
2007-01-03 03:03:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
We have been much more divided than we are now son and in my liftime. We survived the freakin' Civil War and you are ready to question wether we can survive this? So little faith....
2007-01-03 04:25:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Not in the long run. We need a Gerald Ford to come in and cross party lines. But who is going to do it? Joe Lieberman and John McCain, maybe. Certainly not what we have in DC now.
2007-01-03 04:07:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋