I know--they don't want to give up their homeland, right? But wouldn't it be simpler to just move to Lebanon, Jordan, or Egypt and get it over with? Why would that be so bad? That's where their refugee relatives are, anyway. Maybe they could just become citizens of those countries. BTW, I am NOT pro Israel just by asking this question--I am sincerely curious.
2007-01-03 02:38:59 · 19 answers · asked by L Dawg 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Excuse me, you have asked this question because you have never been in a similar situation. How can we give up our homelands...... (in another language) How can we give up our lands on which our forefathers lived, worked, laughed, cried, danced and had nice and sad times???? How can we give up our lands that our forefathers spent their lives on and did the best they could to make it a nice country??? I'd rather forget my name before I forget my homeland (Palestine)....... don't try.... Palestine will long live in the hearts of Palestinians.
2007-01-03 06:42:36 · answer #1 · answered by MagicWand 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hmm.. well, you live in states? If you don't, let's suppose that you do.
Can you move back to where ever you came from? Probably Europe. Because, the land really belongs to the Native Americans, no? So, let's displace the 300 million Americans back to their homelands or some other country. I am sure Canada would be happy to take you. They are empty.
I understand your question, it's a legitimate question. But moving down the block is hard enough, permanent shifting because of racial or religious divisions is obviously going to kill.
A much easier solution would be for Israel to stop expanding into and illegally occupying the West Bank, Golan Heights, Gaza Strip and Sinai. And make peace.
2007-01-03 08:33:56 · answer #2 · answered by worries 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What other country WANTS more refugees?
A people who had their land stolen by the UN to create Israel shouldn't have had to move in the first place.
2007-01-03 02:56:05 · answer #3 · answered by kingstubborn 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They don't want them. Thats where they originally came from. They are refugees from those countries and now they cant go back. Those countries are hypocritical when it comes to really caring about peace. All they want in the end is the end of Israel. That's what it's always been about and always will be.
2007-01-03 02:44:47 · answer #4 · answered by Waterboy 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Why doesn't israel give the Palestinians there land back and go back to europe. And for the person who asked this question, tell me where you live and i will come and live in your house and in your home. Are you willing to give up your homeland. Why should they. Because they're not white.
2007-01-03 02:59:19 · answer #5 · answered by aland411 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
the placement are you getting this concept that Arabs at the instant are not allowed to stay in Israel itself? i think of of you're waiting to desire to examine your sources for bias. Israel itself has an Arab inhabitants it truly is something like 24% of its entire, which includes a million/10th of the sitting persons of Parliament. There are resident Arabs who've refused to settle for Israeli citizenship. in evaluation, Jewish voters have been relocated from the Gaza Strip in 2005. in easy terms 2% of Jordan is non-Arab. i'm going to't discover information on no count if Jews are allowed to alter into voters, yet for beneficial that selection can not in all probability be large. Jordan contains 7/8ths of the Mandate territory (itself a nineteenth century build without historic beginning place). that may not the Jews who're refusing to share. the area is the refusal of its Arab neighbours to settle for a Jewish-majority state of their midst. A state which substitute into made necessary via making use of the anti-Jewish violence which noted the upward thrust in Arab nationalisms that have been given here approximately after the dismantling of the relatively tolerant Ottoman Empire. Many Arabs for the period of the mid east weren't satisfied to have Jewish neighbours and then have been given nasty whilst the neighbours moved with desire of looking secure practices. in the event that they might merely settle for a Jewish-majority state, none of this could be a undertaking.
2016-10-19 10:01:25 · answer #6 · answered by barn 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have to agree with Webber.There is no guarantee that Israel won't be attacking those countries they move in.It has done it in the past under the pretext that they want to get rid of the PLO.We saw that Israel finds different reasons to attack the countries around it(even if it is not under attack) and occupy their land...
2007-01-03 03:58:46 · answer #7 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Even if the Palestinians did move to, say, Lebanon, what is to say the Israeli's won't attack Lebanon for more land? They have a history of doing such things.
2007-01-03 03:21:27 · answer #8 · answered by Webber 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They hate Israel and want to see them wiped off the face of the earth. Terrorists are the most intolerant breed ever created and they have no desire to appease anyone. They will kill whoever they want for whatever they want.
Look at the map, all those muslim countries and they are so hateful and completely shamefully greedy they cannot tolerate Israel having such a small piece of land.
Now that, to the world, should be intolerable. But no, once again political correctness have infiltrated every political entity across the globe.
God help us all.
2007-01-03 02:50:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
During the Civil war Abraham mLincoln wanted to send freed slaves to colonize parts of South America. He figured with all the abuse they had taken, and all the abuse they were going to take it would be the best thing for them.
They wouldnt go
I guess your home is your home sometimes no matter how bad things are going there
2007-01-03 02:46:50 · answer #10 · answered by gdeach 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋