English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If big business supports and lobbies for a soft policy on Illegal immigration, then the democrats, who hate big business, will have more votes. Is that really in the best interest of big business in the long run? Or us--that's our 401Ks we're talking about?

2007-01-03 02:18:35 · 10 answers · asked by Curt 4 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

10 answers

I think it will be impossible to elect a republican ever again if we get millions of illegals getting amnesty. Then I can laugh at businesses who thought letting them in was a good idea. Then cry when when the anti capitalist liberals have us standing in bread lines to get our rations.

2007-01-03 02:47:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Big business and democrats are not always on opposing sides and saying that big business hates democrats is untrue. Democratic policies like regulation tend to favor very large business because it creates economies of scale that only large corporations can deal with and spread out effectively. Large corporations have enough money to support lobbyists who can influence democrats and republicans to make legislation anti-competitive.

Extremely liberal Democrats don't really hate big business they hate common people who buy from big business the ignorant consumer.

The average democrat probably only wants a little bit more regualtion than currently exists and Big Business can live with that.

2007-01-03 02:38:16 · answer #2 · answered by halfway 4 · 0 0

unlawful immigration does no longer strengthen a query of believers and atheists. it somewhat is the two a Humanitarian and usa coverage difficulty. it somewhat is even however genuine that church homes have become greater activists for immigration( criminal or unlawful), yet there are various different independant companies rather in touch in this. My opinion on it somewhat is that each and each usa has rules and immigrants ought to regulate to those rules. on a similar time, if the regulation fails to give up unlawful immigration, governments ought to concentration on the intragration of unlawful immigrants for humanitarian motives. The harm to human dignity in forcing somebody to somewhat the rustic he only illegally immigrated in is larger than what a rustic could be afflicted by a violation of an immigration regulation. on the different hand, unlawful immigrants ought to settle for to take a step to combine the hot society. question of being human and civic, believers or atheists.

2016-11-26 00:36:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Actually, with illegals you are talking about pure grunt labor, so its appeal to big business is very limited. (Obviously agriculture, etc. loves it)

The Dems want illegals because they flood America with ignorant people ripe for the teachings of communism (their partry mantra).

-Aztec276

2007-01-03 02:28:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

UMMM HELLLLLLO!!!
remember Bush's guest worker program???!!

any illegals will just come back as guest workers, that is the republcian amnesty....works good for big business!! no change whatsoever, just more GOP hype!

so yes, big buesiness and illegal immigration does mix well...for big business...not Americans working for them.

2007-01-03 02:25:00 · answer #5 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 0 1

illegal immigration doesn't help all that much when you consider that big businesses can just as easily outsource.

2007-01-03 02:26:17 · answer #6 · answered by clarinetalex 1 · 1 1

You bet it does, think of how much they save by not needing to give jobs to legal Americans.

2007-01-03 02:27:40 · answer #7 · answered by Thomas S 6 · 0 0

ask Nancy pelosi
she hires them in her restaurants and vineyards

2007-01-03 02:22:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It has worked out so far.

2007-01-03 02:21:28 · answer #9 · answered by your_name_here 3 · 1 1

no

2007-01-03 02:19:49 · answer #10 · answered by Mary Smith 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers