English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

21 answers

Certainly. They tried (Dravid and Chappel) but could not stop Dada from making runs in domestics and now Dada is in, so Dravid is in fear. Its simple ! Isn't it ?

2007-01-03 17:42:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

hes been performing not up to the standards we all know as but at the same time hes been unlucky and the captaincy should stay with Dravid as he is a good one.

2007-01-03 22:51:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anirudh T 3 · 0 0

No reason can affect Dravid's performance,afterall he is the wall of India.

In his last 5 dismissals 3 were the wrong decision made by umpires.
I'm sure that in next series which is India vs Srilanka vs Westindies in India,Ganguly will be captaining India.

2007-01-03 16:07:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Indian crew batted more desirable, bowled more desirable, fielded more desirable and performed more desirable than the English crew. England became outplyed in each and every branch which has contributed to a whitewash. They got here up hostile to a twister through call Yuvraj Singh. England did not have killer bowlers of their crew. Tremlett and Bresnan would have made a distinction. They performed Anderson in 4 matches yet Anderson at the same time as conceding 158 runs might want to not take even a unmarried wicket in 4 matches. Stuart extensive became injured. Flintoff, Stuart extensive, Swann and Harmison bowled nicely. Samit Patel, Bopara and Collingwood were not very valuable in bowling. basically Pietersen and Owais Shah batted quite nicely. Bopara batted ok and the perfect gamers done miserably. On a 'in protecting with tournament' foundation, the guy participant performances of britain are given below on a nil-one hundred scale. Pietersen (fifty 4.6); Owais Shah (fifty 4.3); Flintoff (40 3.8); extensive (40 2.9); Bopara (36.6); Patel (32.5); Swann (31.8); Harmison (30.6); Bell (24.9); Collingwood (24.4); earlier (13.a million); prepare dinner (11.7); Anderson (5.9). The performances of Indian gamers on a 'in protecting with tournament' foundation are: Yuvraj (one hundred); Sehwag (80 4.9); Gambhir (50.4); Tendulkar (40 2.4); Dhoni (39.4); Zaheer (38.3); Ishant (35.6); Yusuf Pathan (35.a million); Harbhajan (34.a million); Munaf Patel (26.5); Raina (25.8); Rohit Sharma (15.4); RP Singh (13.2); Irfan Pathan (5.a million). established: Batting - India one hundred England 80 4. Bowling - India one hundred England sixty 9 Fielding - India one hundred England fifty 4 established - India one hundred England seventy seven.

2016-10-16 23:13:14 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

no, v r blessed to hav a captain like him.
he has just now becum a father, he has lot many tensions, he has the tension of the indian team's poor performance too.
now all the indians r planning to push chappell away, in such a situation he is trying to protect chappel's identity too n hav tension of who will b the nxt coach.

wen ganguly was a captain all such problems were not ther.
the team was performing well, n d coach too was gud.
but 4m the time chappel came indian team got bad luck.
the only way to avoid this is drive away chappel n get india 2 coaches, 1 for batting n d other for bowling.
ther must 2 coaches for both fields as ther will be whole concentration of the coaches in both them equally.

2007-01-04 01:56:54 · answer #5 · answered by Roopa R 3 · 0 0

Dravid is not out of form.. he's suffering from bad luck..
In the second test, he was not out in both the innings, victim to 2 bad decisions. In his short stay at the wicket for the third test,he showed he's not out of form.. he raced to 26 of 23 balls. A big innings from dravid is on it's way..

2007-01-03 09:37:29 · answer #6 · answered by annoose1 2 · 0 0

It is unfair to expect a player to perform well consistently throughout his carreer. They have to go through bad times also in their carreer. Unfortunately Dravid is going through bad time and it has got nothing to do with captaincy.

2007-01-03 16:16:04 · answer #7 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 0

ganguly needs to b made captain. he took us to the final of the 2003 world cup and was the most sucessful captain for india. having sed that, dravid did win the west indies series in 2006 which was important as we neva won out of subcontinent in ages. make ganguly captain and let dravid make runs.

2007-01-03 03:57:30 · answer #8 · answered by Bhavesh P 1 · 0 0

Its really strange but Dravid has been gettin out most of the time caught behind the wicket and I think that his finger hasn"t healed yet and maybe he shud"nt have played the first test.

2007-01-03 02:20:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

GANGULY is back in the team,so he has a possibilty of losing his captaincy.
May be because of this fear he is having poor performance.

2007-01-03 02:28:35 · answer #10 · answered by mousumi_19 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers