English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Linda Brown was the 3rd grade girl that the Supreme Court enabled to attend a white school in 1951.

Today, Ms. Brown's sister wants the same Topeka Kansas school system to allow charter schools as a way of getting rid of the lousy education that black kids get in public schools today.

But, the teachers unions could care less about the black kids. The Democrat Teachers Union is AGAINST MS. BROWN AND THE POOR BLACK KIDS.

Sadly, Ted Kennedy is the #1 fan of teachers unions.

2007-01-03 01:34:13 · 8 answers · asked by junglejoe 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

8 answers

It is nice to see that there are some people that have open their eyes and start to realize that the democratic party is the enemy of black people. I have been trying to show blacks by example but it has been difficult.
40% black dropout rate with a public school system basically run by democrats, 50 % of all black children aborted with the policy encouraged by democrats.

A welfare dependency system that has handicap a generations of blacks a system created by democrats.
A social security system that has blacks paying into but hardly get any benefits since the average black man lives to 63 a system that the democrats refuse to change. with friends like this blacks do not need any enemies.

2007-01-03 01:55:38 · answer #1 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 0 2

This is an ugly way to phrase what could be a serious question about the merit of charter schools. Why couldn't you leave your favorite whipping boy out of it?

As far as charter schools are concerned, it's a mistake to see them as some sort of panacea. Several studies have shown that students do not perform any better there. And the fact that they are largely free from normal oversight has created a lot of fraud. Is that what you want?

2007-01-03 01:54:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Dems will almost always side with the unions and against the general populace. Will they admit it? NO. But they really do. The teachers unions are shameful - they perpetuate mediocrity and allow bad teachers to be immune from any consequences.

And, yes, Ted Kennedy should be ashamed of his conduct.

2007-01-03 01:38:56 · answer #3 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 0 2

We can glean one worthwhile fact from your question. The public school system is in trouble and in need of revamping. Mainly, the trouble IS the NEA, NTA and other teacher unions/associations. ALL children are getting the short end of the stick. ALL.

Biased bickering helps nobody, and if you are not helping, you are in the way.

2007-01-03 01:40:03 · answer #4 · answered by Rich B 5 · 2 1

If you remember the Kennedy's are the one's that cared
more for the balck people more then any Republican ever
has. Learn your History.
Remember John F. Kennedy?

2007-01-03 01:42:47 · answer #5 · answered by popo dean 5 · 1 0

All valid factors ! in spite of the incontrovertible fact that ; don`t overlook the Liberal Socialist Mantra " DO AS I , SAY no longer AS I DO " ? isn't any one curious with regard to the reality that the Liberal Democrats have been undesirable mouthing our American well-being care gadget for the final decade or longer ? I`m particular you may pull up infinite You Tube movies of each and every democrat in Congress and notice and hear them pummel the rustic well-being care gadget , and boasting that our well-being care gadget isn`t as reliable as different worldwide places "Socialized well-being care gadget" , no longer on an identical time as reliable as Cuba`s as that liberal deranged lunatic Michael Moore tried to portray , alongside with the the remainder of the liberal socialist bias` media as they ran particular`s approximately it ! So in spite of everything the raping of our well-being care gadget by skill of the liberals` , why didn`t they condemn Kennedy for unlikely to that haven of extra advantageous well-being care stated as Cuba ? Why didn`t Kennedy refuse to be taken care of by skill of the very docs` he has blatantly degraded ? Why didn`t the liberals` arise for their so stated as "concepts" of " there`s extra constructive well-being in different worldwide places ". ya` understand why ? because of the fact whilst the scalpel hit`s the surgeons hand , even the Liberal condemners of u . s . a . of america`s well-being care gadget desire to ensure an American flag patch on the docs lapel , and that they dam particular desire to have their rights examine to them in ENGLISH !!!! for this reason ; Liberals instruct to themselves that they themselves don`t have self assurance in what they tell the standard public to have self assurance , for this reason proving to themselves they are liars to the max !

2016-10-29 21:38:24 · answer #6 · answered by barn 4 · 0 0

Teddy loves blacks, as long as they remember to stay at the back of the education bus.

2007-01-03 01:54:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Democrats have always been against blacks. ALWAYS.

2007-01-03 01:36:22 · answer #8 · answered by netnazivictim 5 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers