2007-01-03 01:29:13 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I would vote for him anyday rather than vote for Hillary!!!
2007-01-03 02:17:46 · answer #1 · answered by d3midway semi-retired 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He could be the Republican's best bet, but I'm not sure America will vote another Republican to president this time around... The last one (current one) sort of tarnished things a bit.
Rudy won't be president unless he has some sort of plan for Iraq that is head and shoulders above what any Democrat has laid out. It's issue #1 for this election.
Aside from this.. the 2-party system is quite ridiculous. Why must a candidate affiliate themselves with one party or the other. Both parties are weak-minded and have great conflicts and contradiction in their logic when presenting their stances on just about every issue. When will we vote for someone who isn't on TV or mainstream media? When will we vote for someone because they are truly honest and truly make sense?
This is only my opinion, but it seems we've been duped for quite a while into thinking our vote matters. Our vote doesn't matter nearly as much as where our information comes from.
2007-01-03 01:38:58 · answer #2 · answered by Jape Coyote 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would vote for him...he seems to have some good views...not all Conservatives are hung up on abortion and gay rights...I could care less if gays get married or not...I am not too sure on abortion...but I feel if a woman can opt out on a pregnancy that a man should have the same right...I think that would stop a lot of women just having kids, if they know they might not get child support...I just can not stand behind Liberals on their view of abortion...it is OK to kill babies, zygotes, or whatever...but you should not kill murders...now that does not make sense...
2007-01-03 01:59:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Rudy is almost as liberal a republican as you can find. Rudy favors draconian gun control, which I am opposed to. Still, if it came down between Rudy and Hillary.....I'll dig a hole in the back yard to hide my guns, and vote for rudy
2007-01-03 03:34:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not for winning the Republican nomination. For one thing, he does not have nearly the organization that McCain and Romney have in the early primary states. He needs to get moving quickly if he wants a realistic chance at the nomination at all. He's also too socially liberal (or moderate) for the Republican base.
From what I know, I think he'd be a pretty good president.
2007-01-03 02:19:40 · answer #5 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
very few could have examine this questions and extremely few responded it nonetheless i'm additionally between them a citizen of united statesa. earlier an Indian as we can not stay a citizen of two international locations because of the fact being American resident we're not from now on Indian yet we can pass to our mom land for ever and are unfastened to stay there too loosing all advantages if we live longer i think of , each and every physique loves peace and hate a place the place there's no secure practices . once I see terrorism is a international situation each and every physique could play his or her function . whilst Malala a muslim lady can combat for preparation of females ,whilst a baby needs his or her freedom a terrorist lives in terror and not unfastened from its effects ,an afternoon might come whilst human beings might come forward to wipe it from human minds even nonetheless it truly is merely too late already , there are numerous of ability of destruction to wipe finished humanity if necessary action isn't taken quicker . i'm too small to take any action ,yet all sort of violent movies could be far flung from media so as that we don't have get entry to to them with the aid of any ability . human beings can hire a number of those movies for couple greenbacks and upward thrust as much as combat with family individuals individuals then to next neighbor then at artwork then someplace at procuring mall ,then everywhere he does not think of surprising brought about via media and aspects he can get entry to from cafes and megastar greenback who provide this freedom so relatively . Then we attempt to calm the techniques that's already bombarded with lots adverse counsel international huge .
2016-10-19 09:57:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think so. I hope so. I'd vote for him. I also think that because he's more socially liberal, he can gain a lot of the Democratic base. And then he's moderate enough to gain much of the Republican base.
He's an effective leader, strong, charismatic, decisive, and SMART.
Perfect candidate. I hope he does run.
2007-01-03 01:37:21 · answer #7 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no. no. and uh.... no. take away his performance surrounding 9/11 (which were quite commendable... i'm not trying to detract)... but take away his image as an icon of a national tragedyu, and then do you still feel the same? does he have the vision/experience/personality/skills to run this country.. or rather, these days, to fix this country? that would be a big fat no.
2007-01-03 01:35:11 · answer #8 · answered by Jonny Propaganda 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He'll never get the Republican nomination. He's pro choice and pro gay rights. The republican party has held the opposing view on those two issues for years.
2007-01-03 01:35:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
With the ones anouncing they will run, I agree. He seems to have the most credability. And, before the bashing, I do not know or care what party he is.
2007-01-03 03:56:56 · answer #10 · answered by Common Sense 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd vote for Rudy. I'm a moderate.
2007-01-03 02:32:19 · answer #11 · answered by bebe 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋