Anybody at all...who thinks that children are more important than dogs?
You may think this an odd question...but i haven't found anybody yet who will come out and say it. Is this a UK thing?...or do people prefer dogs to children in the US as well?
2007-01-03 00:09:09 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Dog Lovers are obviously blind to the fact that they have a wild animal in their homes. Lock up owners of Pit Bulls - it is illegal to have them after all so what are the Police waiting for - another little child to die a horrible death ?
2007-01-03 00:13:51 · answer #1 · answered by John M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think that the act of creating a child is the ultimate act of love or folly.how many children today are not loved,abused and abandoned to fate.how many cultures religiously place great store on children for the sole purpose of the continuation of seperatness of that culture or creed and a means of future wealth to the parents or the society they live in?a dog is an animal,yet people who cant place their love for their fellow human neighbours will pamper and pet their animals.a dog is also a source of food and makes good eating when the cupboards bare.whats wrong with the world of the dog lovers is they need to waken up to the reality of the dog,if the dog owner suddenly collapsed and died and no one discoverd the body or dog,then i can assure your average fido wouldn,t hesitate to munch on you to satisfy its instinct to survive.apart from that they are ok and at times are friendlier than some people just remember though the proof is in the eating.
2007-01-03 00:34:29 · answer #2 · answered by john m 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Children are well more important than dogs!! Sorry where did you get the idea from that children are less important?
2007-01-03 00:12:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
children are impt as they pass down the traditions and generations. they are crucial or else the world would have a depleting population. dogs are pets which kips us human happy and less stressful as they are proven to be. an ardent pet lover may definitely think that dogs are better then children. its the perception of one. but i tink in a global view, children are more impt.
2007-01-03 00:13:26 · answer #4 · answered by pink-cookies 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I love dogs. I live in Australia. I hate some children. I am 13 yrs old.
2007-01-03 00:12:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
My Staffie is not a Replacement for children. Hes much more important than that!
2007-01-03 00:17:35 · answer #6 · answered by uk_staffie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have two children and four dogs.
If I had enough money to buy food for only the children or the dogs I would buy dog food.
I would then cook the fattened dogs and give them to my children to feast on.
Does that answer your question.
2007-01-03 00:12:33 · answer #7 · answered by maughanjohnson 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, kids are definitely more important than dogs!
But then, I could be biased as I'm allergic to the little yappy ones...
2007-01-03 00:12:00 · answer #8 · answered by Natalie B 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
of course children are more important than dogs
2007-01-03 00:30:01 · answer #9 · answered by serephina 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
children are 100% more important than dogs !!! ok !! Any one who disagrees is insane!!
2007-01-03 00:13:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋