he is a man of violence and initiate violence that thus deprive iraq from peace
2007-01-03 00:03:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by pink-cookies 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just because you don’t like George W. Bush you can’t come to the conclusion that he should be hanged. If Bush ordered 148 USA civilians to be killed, he would be hanged.
But he didn’t and if he did then America would’ve put him on trail and then make sure justice would have been done. This is what he is doing: He is keeping all of the fighting away from our homeland so that we could be safe at night.
In war there is a difference in between civilians and solders. Collateral damage does happen sometimes in war. Nobody likes collateral damage. A lot of people think that America/Americans like collateral damage. They don’t! Even though Bush is commander and chief you can’t say it’s his fault for collateral damage. I believe Bush dislikes it as well.
The question you should be asking is, “Why are these psychos’s killing civilians on purpose when they have a problem with a government? Why are governments killing their civilians when they voice their opinions and why are some governments trying to teach there children to grow up and kill themselves with a car bombs or airplanes? But most of all why are some governments starving their own people to produce nukes?” No God of any faith teaches that nonsense.
Only evil leaders who are brain washing their own people are doing this nonsense. These evil leaders are also trying to say that there was no holocaust. I’m not even Jewish and I have the common sense to know what happen during WWII. Do you?
Bush might not be the best leader but at least he is not forcing civilians to kill others. The American military is on a volunteer basis. America is not the best system of government but it’s a hell a lot better then most. America is a place were nobodies with hard work can actually do something with there life.
Your question is not only stupid but it shows a lack of common sense. Saddam Hussein on the other hand did order hundreds of his civilians to their graves. His country hung him and now justice has been served.
2007-01-05 16:09:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jblogs 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was hanged because that is the punishment for the crimes he committed in his own country.
The US tried to have the hanging cancelled but the Iraq governement decided to go through with it regardless of the potential outcomes.
He was found guilty of crimes against humanity.
Perhaps the question should have been is it moral to take the life of another as a punishment for a crime.
If you mother, father, sister, brother were killed by someone, would you ask for the death penalty for that person? Does it make it right?
Would life in prision be a more humane punishment?
The death penalty is a can of worms....
The west had interfered enough in Iraq, would forbidding the death penalty be one step too far?
Does taking the life of one make up for the many that he was responsible for killing?
If the war in Iraq is proven to be illegal (not just surmised to be illegal), does it mean that Bush, Blair and co. are held responisble for the same trial and applicable punishment.
Large can, many worms...
2007-01-03 00:41:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Shiner 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was convicted of killing 148 people. The truth is he murdered hundreds of thousands of his own people. President Bush may be many things, but he isn't a mass murderer. Why don't you read a bit on the subject before posting a question? Take a spelling lesson too.
Are you actually equating ants with people?
2007-01-03 00:14:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Firespider 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Before anything I am going to answer...one word{grammar}.
Now. Saddam Husein had killed THOUSANDS of people in this war. And personally I think this is getting kind of boring. If we did get attacked China would kick their asses back to the age of stones, rocks, and Phonecia(fo-nee-shuh).And Bush he is not a culprit of this. To be honest I am an anarchist. I think he is a royal prick getting too much credit for trying to stay in war by saying that the soldiers can't be pulled out untila couple of years from now. I am going to love next year. He looks like a retarded monkey.
2007-01-03 01:16:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kane(not the wrestler) 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Where is the 148 number coming from? Hussein killed hundreds of thousands of his own people. Maybe he killed 148 on a slow day...dunno about that.
2007-01-03 00:46:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
He's being hanged for ordering the torture and murder of over 100 unarmed citizens of his country because they have a different religious beleif then he does. It would be the same thing as Bush ordering a town tortured and murdered for being Catholic. It has nothing to do with his war with the US, the war with Iran or the invasion of Kuwait.
2007-01-03 00:12:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by jjbeard926 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The USA had nothing to do with the hanging of Saddam. He was tried in an Iraqi court, under Iraqi laws, convicted by an Iraqi judge, and hanged by Iraqi's.
Sorry, we can't help you.
2007-01-03 00:04:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by kja63 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Saddam Husein was found guilty in a court of law of committing horrendous crimes, including mass genocide. The sentence was death by hanging. End of story.
2007-01-03 00:12:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am constantly amazed by how many stupid people ask ignorant questions on this website.
There should be some kind of rule that someone has to have some kind of sense before they ask a question.
Overall, though, who cares? I make all kinds of points just telling these stupid people that they're stupid.
2007-01-03 01:09:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by kvalley_94061 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There Hanging Him Because He Deserves It!
2007-01-03 00:03:52
·
answer #11
·
answered by † Dark Prince † 4
·
0⤊
0⤋