I have read the fuhrer justification on attacking russia in 1942, i think somebody stab germany at the back?

Question

can you see for the betterment of germany and its people,today, citizen around the world calling the fuhrer! a criminal, i think its the other way around, let me call it, this way?, the victors maybe are the criminals, can you comment on these?

Answer 1

Maybe you should take a good look at who Hitler was mate. He was so-called. bettering Germany, through the most atrocious of acts on people. He wanted an Aryan race...a blond haired, blue eyed, perfect soldier race. His justifications for attacking those who weren't Aryan and attacking Russia was shite. And I'm not saying that the other Westerners are entirely perfect...You're focused on Hitler, I personally would sum him up as a criminal.

Answer 2

Well, give us your complete thought then, Jun J, who do you think 'STABBED Germany IN the back"? Germany would still be a fine country with it's pre-war 1939 borders (minus Austria and Czech 'Sudeten Land). The Fuhrer's criminal behaviour began before the war, with the murder of his own SA leaders, the imprisonment and murder of GERMAN Communists, Jews, Gypsies, Anti-Facists, and the Mentally Retarded. Let me put it this way - the Nazis (and their European allies) enslaved most of Europe, and slavery is criminal. The victors put an end to this slavery.

Answer 3

I haven't read your sources but I feel common perception on good and evil is misguided. America was the main power behind the Alliance's victory and has gained through that enough prestige to further it's campaign of world domination (cliche but you get the drift). The main difference between the two sides was the Axes' inhumane way of treating prisoners and it's favoring of genocides. I just think the Alliance proved to be the better of two evils (so to speak). Though nowadays I wonder if it was just a matter of style...

Answer 4

is this a question or a statement

Please restate the question without your perspective