English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

Yes, since the stats have been kept. Oakland has the worst offensive output on record.

2007-01-03 02:08:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In modern times yes. There were probably worse during the 20's and 30's. It's the worst Raiders offense ever though.

2007-01-03 09:01:45 · answer #2 · answered by fostermark_2000 4 · 0 0

I'm not actually sure if it would be mathematically and statistically "the worst", but they have a ten tons of problems in a five pound bag. Their offense is horrid, their defense is even worse.

This team doesn't need help, it needs religion. Like in the Exorcist, when Reagan spits out the pea soup, that's what they are doing to their season ticket holders.

Good luck being a fan of that team.

2007-01-03 07:32:47 · answer #3 · answered by Joey V. 1 · 0 0

with the talent they have, yes. when will people stop placing the blame on the oakland coaches and blame Al Davis he is calling the shots.

2007-01-03 09:08:00 · answer #4 · answered by King Midas 6 · 0 0

"Hey atleast we beat the Raiders!"

2007-01-03 07:50:23 · answer #5 · answered by DyrtByrd 4 · 0 0

look at the brown's

2007-01-03 07:58:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If it isn't then it must be pretty close

2007-01-03 08:09:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

browns are

2007-01-03 07:37:57 · answer #8 · answered by hawknome 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers