Dual core was designed only for the multitasking people. But the issues with dual core are that if you don't have dual channel memory I wouldn't even bother with it. The other CPU speed is plenty fast for just Internet use.
2007-01-03 19:44:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anointed71 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
A Dual Core will give more scope for upgrading, so thats a good choice ; the only caveat here would be, how often do you upgrade? If you plan on using this next PC for less than 2 years, it may be better to buy a Cheaper Single Core 3.x Ghz, and then getting what will then be either a quad core, or whatever they will call an 8 core ) [Octet ??]. Anyways, a good buy in both cases if you can get a centrino ... Dual cores are usually Centrino technology I think...
2007-01-03 00:06:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mictlan_KISS 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is the dual core because 2.66 x 2 is greater then just 3
though the application has to properly use both the cores to gain an advantage
windows will manage the threading for you (decide which core to use for which application) so you should always get better performance
plus, some applications are written to take advantage of dual cores/dual processors and will use both of them itself to boost performance
about the problems, i have never heard any, so i cant help you there
2007-01-02 23:16:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
core 2 duo is the best of 3 ..
it handles many prog at a time and doesnt f*** up..
so go for it...
2007-01-02 23:09:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by sweetraskels 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the core 2 buy heaps
2007-01-02 23:06:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by santazlittlehelpa 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
core duo because it can process multiple programs better at the same time
2007-01-02 23:06:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by babushcat 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
core 2 duo is way faster...and i mean waaaaaaaayyyy!!!
2007-01-05 10:44:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by .o0O O0o. 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It denpens on what your going to use it for.
2007-01-02 23:07:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by bugzaper 3
·
0⤊
0⤋