2007-01-02 19:45:31 · 17 answers · asked by bobb_hellob4u 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Saddam's execution was for hiding the crimes of the USA under the Bush regime.
2007-01-02 19:52:54 · answer #1 · answered by madhatter 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he committed no crime, it was his country we helped him get, the list of names he read and thenb killed came from the ex head of CIA George W. Bush, and the chemical attacks were covered up by us, take a look for yourself at the headlines for he attacks when they happened, and then find out why. The people tried assassinating Saddam and were helping Iran. We were helping Iraq which makes us attleast partlt responsible even if you dont feel that is the case, why didnt we remove himin 1991? after the first gulf war? The questions would have been answered if the Shiites diudnt kill for revenge first, in america all trials are finished before the killer is destroyed but here he was destroyed to protect the other killers.
What a scare on America, we help dicxtators with the CIA for Drug money and then we call them the Boogie Man we are getting pathetic. momma needs a new bag, adddy needs a new pair of shoes and America needs to wake up and get a real president and ask the world for forgivness.
2007-01-02 23:49:17 · answer #2 · answered by tunny_goss 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
who asked this stupid question?? It is not Mr. Saddam to be executed but Mr. Bush. Bush must be executed for his crime against the whole humanity. Thousands of people being killed every day by the U.S Army. All in the name of War against Terror.Saddam was a courageous man that the world has ever seen. But Bush is a coward. Courageous people die only once. There will be a
2007-01-02 21:53:31 · answer #3 · answered by samb_up 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
saddam was a ruthless dictator and his regime was of a brutal ruler who ordered mass killings at his whims..execution is a maximum punishment that can be awarded though some belive that capital punishment is indeed not a severe punishment as the criminal does not has to go thru pain and toture which he imposed on his victims.....that is matter of debate ,,,,but in saddam's case one thing that is to be remarked is ,,he is not only punished for his crimes but americans have used this case very politicaly and diplomaticaly ,,,and this case was more than a ordinary trial.......saddam culd have been trialed for several other of his crimes but he was tried for killing SHIAS,,,by this move america meant to divide muslim community and this indeed was a brilliant strategy...and strategy served its cause to some degree as it is evident by differences within muslim community,,,,,iraqis have welcomed this whereas SUNNIS across the world have resented this...in india most of muslims are SUNNIS therefore we see lot of protests but else where in world there are mixed reactions......hence saddam's execution was to be carried immediately bcoz internation court of justice ,geneva culd have intervened and wuld have taken time for judgement ,,,,,and in april 2007 saddam was to celebrate 70 years,,,,and in turn wuld celebrate his life...coz as per iraq constitution death penalty cant be awarded to person over 70 years,,,,,hence though execution was not enuf,,,americans were helpless to punish him more......thus they decide to execute him
2007-01-03 01:55:09 · answer #4 · answered by mea culpa 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If only execution is the answer for one's crimes then what about bush & the like people roaming freely in the world ?
They too must be executed
2007-01-02 20:04:23 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dear brother there is two things now crime is starter in iraq they will not stop now bush told to the people that he means saddam wanted to killed my father this is not fighting between dictator ship this is fiting between bush and saddam but saddam lost his life.
if his hang is legal for murder for 150 shitt then why bush is not hang because he is murderer of 100,000 civilien. he is most criminal because u know that in war only miltery fight with each not fight with civilien so there for bush is big criminal in the history
he also hang in any of the time because now a day he is president but when completed he will be also hang by his people same as saddam
2007-01-02 19:57:51 · answer #6 · answered by khan1974rashid 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Everything is fair in love and war. So we cannot judge anything in this matter. What has happened has happened. Saddam killed innocent villagers in ethnic cleansing. Bush killed innocent iraqi's in war. So they are even. Saddam killed to prove his majority and strength of his people and party. Bush killed to protect the interests of US. Let God be the judge of who is wrong and who is right.
2007-01-02 20:05:46 · answer #7 · answered by sunilbernard 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it was not punishment but freedom from punishment
the person who killed thousands and was a dictator of Iraq has been executed but who will execute the one who killed 6 lakh civillians in iraq ,destroyed Afghanistan and is now eyeing Iran, the one who is trying to be the dictator of the world?
2007-01-03 04:26:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
For every action there is equal and opposite reaction. God has his own way of wreaking vengeance. Hence, it is not for us to judge Saddam.
2007-01-02 19:54:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
saddam's execution is really condemned,if saddam executed for his crime,then why not for bush?he is killing so many peoples in iraq,lebenon,
2007-01-02 20:00:46 · answer #10 · answered by naufal1986 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋