The reports describe a female guard who detainees said handled their genitals and wiped menstrual blood on their face. Another interrogator reportedly bragged to an FBI agent about dressing as a Catholic priest and "baptizing" a prisoner.
Some military officials and contractors told FBI agents that the interrogation techniques had been approved by the Defense Department, including directly by former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.
2007-01-02 19:36:26 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
It doesn't surprise me. I hope most Americans are ashamed by the behaviour of some people put in charge of prisoners whatever they may have done and the prisoners in Guantanemo Bay have generally done very little to deserve to be treated as badly as many of them have been (not to mention at Abu Ghraib).
2007-01-02 20:03:16 · answer #1 · answered by Stag S 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
You are way off base. Sometime you have to get some sack. A little bit of tough interrogation techinques. Blah Blah Blah. This is where other world powers need a backbone. If water boarding saves hudreds of lives I say board his ***. As for the menstrual blood on the face there are some freaks out there that might actually like that. And I know many of you like your genitals handled. Where is it so bad. Get a life and worry about something meaningful.
2007-01-03 02:07:11 · answer #2 · answered by Chris D 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Here are a few issues I have with your statements.
One, that "female" guard was also assaulted by prisoners with a mixture of urine, feces, and other rather vile bodily fluids because she was a female. Did she handle genitals? I wouldn't rule it out but if I had to control a guy that's much bigger than me, wouldn't you? I discount the menstrual blood. That's bull crap. I know that for a fact.
Two, the whole "baptism" thing is an urban legend and has been discounted NUMEROUS times. I guess you didn't want to read that, though.
Three, there are interrogation methods that have been approved by DOD. None of them allow torture. We know that torture is not only inhumane but gathers bad intel. People will tell you whatever you want to hear to end it. That's not the intent.
Lastly, the US doesn't behead, publicly slaughter, drill holes in people, beat people, conduct "extra judicial killings", or threaten families to leave their homes.
I know you don't read about it because the media doesn't like to talk about it, but that is what our enemy is doing to innocent civilians.
There are worse things than having a female guard play with your balls.
2007-01-02 20:04:58 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
If the U. S. had to shelter battling terrorism, we'd turn to the american people first. i can't have self assurance that the people of this ignorant us of a stay led by technique of a sheep in wolves clothing. the american people do not prefer to be attentive to what occurred on 9/11, yet proceed in charge people who had no area interior the terrorist act on 9/11. shame on you and another person who denies what's extremely actual. Our us of a experienced the phobia that became payed for by technique of the international's elite households; particularly the Rockefeller's. George Bush new all approximately it until now it occurred. that is documented all around the internet, and that is documented in historic previous. awaken and cease appearing like each thing is purely large! You voted Obama in, and you and that i'll adventure a lot heart soreness with him in workplace. not because of the fact of his race, not because of the fact of his intelligene, yet because of the fact one can't attain the severe workplace of President of the U. S. with out advertising his or her soul. we are too efficient and furnish too many opportunities for the very corrupt. With money comes potential and the situation to enforce that potential.
2016-12-15 14:29:57 · answer #4 · answered by hayakawa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lets play a little role play, I will be the Islamic prisoner. You can be the American. You find a girl to be my guard to play with my balls, and then baptize me.Then I will find a guy with a sword to cut your head off slowly, and film it so we can put it on the Internet. Then we will decide who really got treated worse. You are a simple fool with no common sense whatever. Losing your head will cause you no problems since you do use it anyway.
2007-01-02 20:39:10 · answer #5 · answered by mark g 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
After all the outrages perpetrated on innocents by the Ilsamo-fascist terrorists, I don't care. Call me when a bunch of hooded Amercans saw one of their heads off with a dull bayonet like they did to Nick Berg. I want to post that video on Youtube.
2007-01-02 23:48:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
difficult question.... just what defines abuse or not of a prisoner of war? If the obective is to "crack" the psyche of a person how are you planning to do that by nice acceptable means.... sit down and have coffee with them? well I find a lot of these alleged practise distatsefull the easy answer is.... DONT BE A PRISON OF WAR! then you dont have to worry about.... as for those who are standing up for what they believe in... kudos to them for having strong beliefs... sucks to be a prisoner of war though... WAR IS UGLY get over it.
2007-01-02 21:59:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm not sure I've heard all that you mentioned but if it is true, that is totally uncalled for, but then again; why is it we always hear that BAD things and not the GOOD we're doing??? Let's post some postive things about our military. No, wait, people usually don't like to hear that stuff; only the gory things.
2007-01-02 19:42:02 · answer #8 · answered by Nancy D 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
At least they are a live with the posibility of seeing thier family again. More then I can say about the victims of 9/11.
2007-01-02 19:43:24 · answer #9 · answered by wondermom 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
can i send you to a Gitmo to report to us how the conditions are? I would love to see you there - maybe the few corrupt authorities in the us military will be present and show you a great time.
i hope you enjoy your cuban vacation.
2007-01-02 20:54:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋