I only remember the one thing where theres no gravity in space so in one of the pics the flag looked like it was moving as if there was a breeze. Without gravity it should stay still. Does anyone know any other thing about why we might not have landed on the moon?
Yes I do thing we really landed on the moon. I just want to know the other people reasonings.
2007-01-02 18:32:48 · 8 answers · asked by infiniteson 3 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Here were some of the reasons:
There was no blast crater under the LUNAR MODULE so we didn't land there.
Since the stars were not visible in the photographs, it proved they were not onthe Moon
The flag was waving, caused by the breeze in the studio where it was filmed.
The Moon has no air, so a flag cannot wave.
There were shadows on the Moon going in different directions; proof that there was more than one light source.
Astronauts would have been burned to death from the radiation in the Van AllenRadiation Belts.
and so on......
Yes, we did land on the moon!
To Prasanna - Nasa is considering going back to the moon in the next 2-3 years.
2007-01-02 18:47:42 · answer #1 · answered by Incognito 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Personally speaking, I think we did not land on the moon, because these "is" somebody already there who does not want us to go exploring on their surface. If we did really go there, why have we not been back since and I think it would have made a lot more sense to build a moon base instead of having a spacecraft orbiting around Earth. A moon base would have made a great launcing pad to further explore our Solar System, but I am afraid the current inhabitants on the moon would totally dissagree with that idea as well as a few people on Earth who really know what is going on up there !
2007-01-02 21:27:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm no conspiracy theorist, but I've heard that there were camera shots from well outside of the craft as Neil Armstrong supposedly took the "first" steps on the moon.
2007-01-02 18:39:12 · answer #3 · answered by BRAINS! 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
People say that technology wasn't that advanced yet. Others say it was a stage set in a studio done at a time when people could be fooled because stage effects were so advanced (*** backwards to think obviously).
2007-01-02 18:41:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
"Seeing is believing" but
I don't believe for one second that man has walked or even landed on the moon... If this is the case why has no one done it since that era?
Steven Edwards, Kirkby, Liverpool
2007-01-02 18:45:41 · answer #5 · answered by Prasanna 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Van Allen radiation belts were too strong, not space suit existed at the time to protect man. so they couldn't go and neither did the Russian...
2007-01-03 14:24:24 · answer #6 · answered by JGdancin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lots of people still say that NASA didn't land on the moon
2007-01-02 19:44:43 · answer #7 · answered by futureastronaut1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there are lots of ppl who still believe we didn't, its the same ones that think the u.s. government is responsible for the attacks on 9/11....can anyone say tinfoil hats?
2007-01-02 18:41:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋