WWE is WAY BETTER than TNA, i mean, look at the wrestlers on WWE, it has Cena, DX, Batista, The brothers of Destruction and more, and TNA's wrestlers are stupid (altough i dont know them really well cuz i dont watch tna)
2007-01-02 17:30:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sandy 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
Sure, right now WWE is the more successful product. Does that make it better? No. I do believe TNA is a much more solid professional wrestling show with more actual wrestling ability. TNA has already accomplished what WWE said they wouldn't. With stars like Sting, Kurt Angle, Christian, Rhino, Abyss, AJ Styles, and Samoa Joe the company has much potential. It has finally become a wrestling alternative. I see the company getting better from here.
But yes, WWE is the more successful product. But of course, they are a much bigger company who has been around for many many years so it makes sense, and I'm sure they will continue to be the #1 successful brand for awhile. But WCW almost put the WWF out of business, so TNA can rise up to the height of WWE at some point I'm sure.
The most important thing right now is for professional wrestling as a whole to rise up and become "big" once again. Anyone who doesn't watch wrestling doesn't know John Cena, Randy Orton, Batista, Booker T, or anyone else. They just know Hogan, Rock, Andre, Sting, Goldberg, Savage, Austin, and Flair. TNA is good for the WWE. It gives them compeition so the entire industry has a chance to dig itself out of it's hole.
2007-01-03 00:40:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by bdaly08 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
TNA....
The only reason why these kids on here say WWE is because they have more mainstream ex-poser and TNA doesn't just like that girl 2 post above me she doesn't even know a wrestler on TNA.
But TNA provides WRESTLING and not stupid storyline and stupid promos about frosted cereals and TNA gives WHAT THE FANS WANT
2007-01-03 02:23:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by grant212021 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
WWE is a better company than TNA.
2007-01-03 07:56:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by peterboro_first 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
While WWE is more successful, (hey, they've been around longer), TNA in my book is the better company. They've got the talent and will more than likely continue to get the talent they need to really make the McMahon's sweat.
As my opinion appears to be in the minority, I don't expect to receive the best answer award.
But you asked the question, and I'm giving an answer.
2007-01-03 00:53:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Barry 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I like WWE alot better becuase they have 3 different shows and TNA is only an hour long! But TNA doesn't have anyone like DX,Undertaker,Batista or John Cena, but don't get me wrong they do have some talent. But I just watch TNA because I like wrestling and it's very entertaining.
2007-01-03 00:42:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by hawkhead91 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
well of course its wwe cause they have more money. Tna has only had a tv deal for a year and a half now they are yonug with not very much money but in the future i predect most of wwes big guys jumping to tna
Rvd sabu trish lita are probably going to go to tna in the near future
2007-01-03 01:00:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by KeNnEdY a.K.a. Styles clash 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I agree all the way!!!!!!WWE is the best like on the press conferece today when the coach said that TNA sucked he was kinda right but then u gotta hand it to them because they have sting christian cage and abyss.
2007-01-03 00:25:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
well wwe isnt exactly the best anymore. sadly its gotten horrible and gay and boring. and tna isnt afraid to give their fans what they want to see.so i will say tna.
tna tna tna
2007-01-03 01:41:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by mamas_grandmasboy06 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
thats a hard one uhhh let me think, think, think....WWE!!!!!!!! wwe rocks tna sucks, wwe is the best!!!!
I agree all the way!!!!!!WWE is the best like on the press conferece today when the coach said that TNA sucked he was kinda right
2007-01-03 00:26:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋