English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What are the proven negative spiritual, social, psychological and health affects of homosexuality upon children according to the following article links?
The APA says homosexuality is disorder, that is before homosexuals became a part of APA which is equivalent to the drunks running the drying out clinic.
Medical associations say it should be classified a disorder based upon the addictive negative consequences which often takes lives of men at early ages cutting their lives short by as much as 40%.
Drug usage is admittedly a problem even amongst gays. This creates further health issues. They are pushing for legalized drugs in America. Just what our children need?
Children of homosexuals are often molested by a partner of their parents (much like step-children can be by a hetero step-father granted), and enticed with drugs like Jesse Dirkhising was.
A LONG LIST OF INDEPENDENT PROVEN DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS AND MORE CAN BE FOUND AT http://www.narth.com/index.html

2007-01-02 15:34:56 · 22 answers · asked by Lovin' Mary's Lamb 4 in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender

“Gay activists are sexual Marxists. Legitimizing same-sex unions is a warm-up act. Ultimately, they want to eliminate any barriers, any signposts, that limit or channel the exercise of human sexuality.” - Conservative writer Don Feder13
The public is becoming increasingly concerned about the social fallout of homosexuality, especially on children. The support for traditional marriage transcends religious affiliation, race and socioeconomic status. Americans are becoming increasingly concerned about the social fallout of homosexuality, especially on children.17

http://www.straight-talk.net/gay/gmarriage1.shtml

2007-01-02 15:35:08 · update #1

Adam has created fictitious information from where???

2007-01-02 16:41:22 · update #2

22 answers

no it is not healthy -spiritually-mentally or no other way

2007-01-02 15:43:34 · answer #1 · answered by ageshu 1 · 2 11

Answer: Homosexuality can be a "healthy lifestyle" for America's children (it's not an "alternative," it's a way of living and a personal characteristic of a person).

First, the APA has not classified homosexuality as a disorder since they faced the facts in the 1970s. Gays live just as long as other people and do just as much drugs as other people too.

I'm gay, free of any diseases (STD or otherwise), and the worst drug I use is NyQuill and that's when I'm feeling sick. I can't predict my lifespan but the little online predictors say I have 91-98 years.

Of course, I'd be happy to look at "proof" supporting the contrary as long as it's not coming from a group that claims to administer "therapy for homosexuality" or other such nonsense.

Because, guess what? Homosexuality isn't a disorder or a disease.

2007-01-02 16:16:00 · answer #2 · answered by Target Acquired 5 · 5 2

Wow, this isn't biased at! I bet you checked all of your facts and even pulled some of them out of your ***! Why aren't you on the news telling everybody of your stupendous discoveries? It seems pretty odd to me that someone as thorough as you doesn't have her own tv show yet, maybe after The View. One more question, when you crap what end does it come out of?

Okay, now I'm going to stop dicking around. The fact is that homosexuality is a Godsend to our world. We have an extraordinary problem with our increasing population already and I really don't see gays adding to that problem. If anything they've relieved the stress on orphanages(don't bullshit me about calling it a "group home" Its the same thing) and if we stopped being idiots and started thinking with our brains instead of spewing out Bible quotes we'd see that Gay marriage is actually a good idea. Here's the cut and dry honey, if people would stop bitching about abortion and preaching up the asses of politicians with their religious farse I'd have much more respect for them. If you can't supply a solution then stop complaining. It'd be nice if you'd stop referring to book that has been undoubtedly edited more than once in the duration of it's time on Earth. Do you not think that maybe the editors had no aggenda or motives when they were translating and whatnot? You'd be stupid not to. Try thinking before jumping to outlandish conclusions that, by the way, have not been proven. The site you provide is neither credible nor intelligible.

2007-01-02 16:14:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

When did this site become one to preach your own rotten bullsh*t around? What medical associations say it should be classified as a disorder?
There would be no negative concequences if it wasn't for bigots, much like yourself.
Drug usage is also a problem amongst teens, and we are also enticed by drugs- does that mean been between 13 and 19 is a disorder?
Your "proven" documentation is by a biased group- with a tacky website.
"Children of homosexuals are often molested by a partner of their parents "- where did you get this from? Any statistics?

2007-01-02 15:58:08 · answer #4 · answered by eedaaaaa 1 · 6 1

homosexuality is genetic...it's not an "alternative" choice of any kind. there are no "proven" negative affects. neither the APA nor any medical association classity it as a disorder. drug usage is a problem among all types of people...yes, some gays as well. the majority of children who are molested have been victims of heterosexuals. every single thing you just listed is nothing but lies, generalizing stereotypes and assumptions. you're posting this in the wrong forum...the only people who will support you here are homophobic bigots. you need to read up on REAL facts, not tall tales. ignorance and intolerance are the real problems in this society.

2007-01-03 01:22:42 · answer #5 · answered by redcatt63 6 · 3 1

Clearly you are approaching this question with a foregone conclusion: I.E; that homosexuality is an unhealthy "alternative" for children. You have obviously searched for statements which bolster your own prejudices from illegitimate sources. What I consider singularly unhealthy is the view that homosexuality is somehow dangerous because gay people (and children who grow up to be gay, incidentally) will be discriminated against and, as a result, engage in self-destructive behavior. That is rather like the argument the Nazis advanced that Jews should not have children because they will be made to wear gold stars. I would suggest that if you are concerned about "America's children" you stop laying blame for society's ills at the doorstep of homosexuality and, rather, look at the society that torments the homosexual.
Homosexuality is not the problem; bigotry is.
You have a lot to answer for.

2007-01-02 16:20:37 · answer #6 · answered by delighteddave 3 · 4 1

Homosexuality is a healthy alternative for homosexual children who grow into adults capable of handling all that goes with sexual activity. I think the question you need to be asking is Are parents of homosexual children ready to stand up for their children and be heard by Americans who have no fork in the fire. The ones who choose to be denigratingly vocal about something they know nothing about. We are all here, we all go out to our public lives and we all go home to our private lives. We all live and pay into the same system, we all deserve equal treatment.

Narth has been proven over and over again to be some pie in the sky failure of masked bigotry. All the grandiflora diatribe does is further the cause of polarizing something that is not meant to be a matter of public opinion.

When straight people can clean up their own acts then, maybe then, they can start getting their noses into what takes place inside private law abiding citizens bedrooms. UUntil then, haven't you people got something else to do, like feeding some poor people or something?????

2007-01-02 15:48:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

As all sweetening brokers could be pronounced to be undesirable, not likely. even nonetheless, honey, agave nectar (additionally noted as agave syrup) and fructose are greater "organic" and consequently seen greater healthy possibilities to beet or cane sugar. sidestep all man made sweeteners in any respect expenditures. they could be decrease in energy, yet there are different well being implications. As you desire to make a dessert sauce, this ability conserving it for a while. Sugar is a preservative, so i might use keeping or jam making sugar, then bottle and refridgerate. even nonetheless merely dilute some jam via heating slowly with a splash water. now and back existence is merely too short!

2016-10-19 09:40:34 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If you love you will realize children are the reason that we are on this earth. People can possess every material toy under the sun and come to the realization that children are the very reason that humanity was endowed with a way to procreate. Even if I had feelings for the same sex, I'd marry the opposite sex for that reason. There's nothing on this earth that I enjoy more than the company of family. Big families and lot's of love means lots of happiness for everyone.

2007-01-02 16:39:47 · answer #9 · answered by AtOneWithNature 3 · 5 1

"The public is becoming increasingly concerned about the social fallout of homosexuality, especially on children"? What kind of fanatical group are you in? Is Tipper Gore your president? lol... do you guys have a filthy 15 list for gays on marriage or something? Seriously!!!

Hehe, hun I think you need to realize that NO ONE will ever respect you until you respect everyone who deserves it!... I know I'm a good enough person to earn it, but you don't seem like a good enough one to earn mine. Have a nice night...

PS: Ummm, just exactly what "public" is concerned with gay people? Of all the murderers we have running around on our streets and gay people is what you choose to be concerned with? Doesn't that seems like a waste of your time?

2007-01-02 15:38:52 · answer #10 · answered by IceyFlame 4 · 7 2

This is not a question. It is pushing YOUR agenda masquerading as a question.

Homosexuality is not a choice nor can it be changed. It is inborn and indelible.

The harmful effects of homosexuality you cite here are mainly the result of having to deal with our society's negative views and reactions to homosexuality, not to homosexuality itself.

The biased studies you cite prove nothing but their own bias.

Finally, you should consider changing your nickname to IWantOnlyMyTruthToPrevail. I think that suits you better.

2007-01-03 04:51:27 · answer #11 · answered by Seeker 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers