2007-01-02 15:28:38 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Just will accept the jury decision. One way to approach his acquittal is to consider some of what the jury saw. They heard the Fuhrman tapes where he made highly derogatory statements about blacks then lied underoath. The lead investigator in charge of the whole case freely admitted in court that he took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it back into the crime scene, which is against police policy. The jury saw a video taken by paparazzi of OJ, Nicole, Denise and their parents talking in a nice peaceful manner right after attending OJ/Nicole's daughter's dance recital - and Denise even kissed and hugged OJ (all this was a few short hours before the crime). No murder weapon was ever found and there weren't any witnesses. The "found" glove didn't fit - wrong size (heat shrinks, moisture doesn't). OJ's slow speed drive at 30 mph to his own house is not indicative of guilt. Some may disagree with the jury verdict but it's unfair to state with absolute certainty that this person is guilty. Simpson has always maintained his innocence.
2007-01-04 14:07:20 · answer #1 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have not been able to conclude that OJ was guilty of the murders as charged. The business of the glove smelled too much like a frame-up attempt. But I was abroad at the time the business was in the news, so my data is not complete.
2007-01-02 23:42:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, we are still out here.
OJ is innocent!!!
2007-01-05 23:25:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
OJ is guilty.
He knew that he would get away with it. He is such an arrogant azz*ole, his idea to write a book called "If I did it" proves how arrogant he is. He's laughing about the whole situation and he needs to be smashed in the balls with a sledgehammer.
2007-01-02 23:48:22 · answer #4 · answered by funandsun20 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never thought he was innocent and still believe that he is 100% guilty
2007-01-02 23:36:58 · answer #5 · answered by Gary S 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes we found one, his name is OJ.
2007-01-02 23:31:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No ; and the jury that found him innocent should be checked for sanity .
2007-01-05 21:04:22 · answer #7 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
who the f*** is OJ
2007-01-03 14:13:28 · answer #8 · answered by Zoe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I bet his kids... that are adults now... don't even buy his innocence claims. He killed their mother.
2007-01-02 23:50:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes i do
i saw his trial
2007-01-03 03:40:24 · answer #10 · answered by Stan the man 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋