Do you think that explaining love in terms of biological processes and evolutionary functions strips it of its beauty and meaning? I've heard some say it does. I say that regardless of how love originates or is explained, it's behaviors remain the same, so why not try to fully understand it? What do you think?
2007-01-02 14:57:25 · 5 answers · asked by Subconsciousless 7 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
Yes-better left unsloved and left to the imagination.
2007-01-02 15:16:18 · answer #1 · answered by smeezleme 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think there are 13 forms if love and worth the study but it is probably better to LOVE than to understand LOVE.
But I like your question and thinking. It never hurts to know more.
2007-01-02 15:07:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love is not a mystery, it grows over time.
2007-01-02 15:07:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love isn't something that can necessarily be explained because it affects everyone differently.
2007-01-02 15:05:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
to me love is two meaning word
2007-01-02 15:04:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋