Yes! and to do it in a timely fashion, we should put them all on line on one end and tell then they have 30-days to get to the other side.
I'm tired of seeing us poking victory with a stick!
2007-01-02 14:44:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Curt 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
That's a bad idea for two main reasons:
1. You're giving weapons to convicted criminals. Now, although they may have not commited violent crimes before, what's to stop them from shooting their escort and just leaving Iraq and heading off to say, Saudi Arabia or something?
2. Why would someone who didn't commit a violent crime in the first place want to go shoot people who are willing to shoot back? They have no training or anything, they're dead as can be in a combat situation. Even if you rewarded them with less prison time, I doubt many would go. Prison isn't a nice place to be by any means, but at least there they have some security and safety.
2007-01-02 14:44:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Locomotive 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
i like how nicely you worded precisely how i think relating to the wellbeing care reform that maximum of people disliked. As a nurse, i'm nicely conscious of the financial disaster led to through too many uninsured human beings (inclusive of unlawful aliens) who go away hospitals and docs caught for billions of greenbacks each and each 12 months, which makes something individuals pay loopy fees for medical care. The medical coverage reform grew to become right into a mind-blowing element. I additionally love that Obama signed stem cellular analyze into being criminal some HOURS after going on of work 4 years in the past; a important screw up from George W. Bush (between the). He additionally helps reproductive rights and gay marriage, which is likewise clever in case you have common experience. The financial device grew to become into interior the shitter 4 years agho, and unemployment fees have dropped and are persevering with to drop. He can not waive a magic wand and make issues perfect in a 12 months or so. It takes time, yet issues are going interior the final course. knowledgeable center classification human beings can see that. it somewhat is the individuals with their heads of their assholes who want to think of they are "wealthy" or would be charged some money greater in taxes that are bickering. many that're making plans ot vote for Romney, are not even able to since their vote could in basic terms harm themselves.
2016-11-25 23:52:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by helmkamp 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say we send over the ones that are in for violent crimes. If they like killing people, they should get a real kick out of Iraq. And if they get killed, will anyone really care? Then, after they clean up Iraq, they can go to Afghanistan - how much you want to bet they'd catch bin Laden inside of a week?
2007-01-02 15:36:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not the first person to come up with this idea. The volunteer army wants people at their backs that they can trust, and would be affronted at this idea.
The military has strict entry requirements which do not include prior prison time.
2007-01-02 15:23:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually here is something just as brutal but much simpler: If a person because a suicide bomber, kill their family or burn down their house to demote it. Sooner or later it would have to end. It's not nice but neither is war. The objective is to win as I recall.
2007-01-02 14:41:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Squawkers 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
You've seen "The Dirty Dozen" a dozen times too many
2007-01-02 14:52:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bill G 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
You would probably have better luck with the violent ones.
2007-01-02 14:47:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Let me get this straight: you want our country's foreign policy and military to be represented by criminals. Great.
Don't you know it is a privilege to serve our flag? What is the matter with you!??! You insult each and every soldier, sailor, airman and marine serving with dignity and pride. And you want to put troops with a bounty on death.
Clearly you have never served.
2007-01-02 14:43:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Better than the current plan.
2007-01-02 16:50:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by democrat13 2
·
0⤊
0⤋