If you travel at the speed of light for one hour.... first of all time is relative, so the hour was measured by an observer or by the person traveling??
As we approach the speed of light " time gets stretched" which means one minute to the traveller takes twenty minutes back on earth, for example.
The degree of stretch is based on this excessive speed, of course. Our age will depend on this stretch.We could very well return to a place that is thousands of years after the date we left, and not a sole alive that we even knew.
So the traveler has aged one hour, while the place we left behind has aged a greater number.
For now, science has no way to come close to travelling at such speeds. Furthermore, we can come as close as we like to the speed of light, but cannot travel "At" the speed of light. There is something happening here, as stated time is stretched, or to put it another way slowing down when compared to point of orgin. We can reach some point very close to the speed of light where one min for us is hundreds of years at orgin.
If we travel faster the slowdown is greater, proportionally related. At the speed of light everything would stop, heartbeat, ship traveling etc. this is 100% the speed of light, now if by chance we could travel faster than the speed of light, say 120% speed of light we would be entering a region of imaginary time (where time speeds up from infinity to regular time and is regular time with some strange unit attached to it)
2007-01-02 15:13:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
If you ran nearly at the speed of light, and used a watch to time your run, after the watch shows a time an hour later, youi've run an hour. That help? But to the folks you've left behind, well, they're probably reduced to dust by now, or maybe have become fossil fuel.
2007-01-02 14:38:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Scythian1950 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
i do no longer think of the racing is the issue yet a minority of householders and running shoes. commonly horses seem to savour racing like many love leaping or hacking. even however, like each and every equine game there are lots of people who handle the horses like a device and dont truly care. What i think of you should do is to be sure what's maximum extreme to you and weigh up each and all of the experts and cons. you're saying it skill moving so are you satisfied to try this distinctly because it somewhat is only a small pay upward push with greater hours? From what you have positioned it does not sound such as you truly need to take the job yet experience such as you desire an excuse to no longer. you have already got loads of motives to no longer in the previous you even evaluate your feeling approximately racing. So in case you do no longer like it you only ought to provide those valid motives and not difficulty approximately frightening absolutely everyone or shifting right into a communicate approximately no count number if racing is nice. in case you do surely need the job then choose for it, think of that regardless of the sport as an entire as long as you may provide the horses the final care and love then you truly are making their lives better. good success
2016-11-25 23:52:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by helmkamp 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You should get younger; the scientist had done some tests before.
They have used some super accurate clock (don’t know what kind, but super accurate). One in a lab and the other in a supersonic plane, after the plane run in speed of sound, the clock was a few seconds slower.
And they have done a few times and also exchange the clocks (lab to plane, and plane to lab), and the test was the same.
They have prove that when time travel in high speed, it will get slower. I suppose if you can travel in the speed of light, your time will be slower… and hence get younger.
2007-01-02 14:46:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by BB2791 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
For the person running time would stand still, when he stopped the people around him would be 1 hour older.
2007-01-02 14:39:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Beavis Christ AM 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Speed of light is fast traveling correct? So your really not speeding up time just how you travel. So..really..i dont think either would fit it.
But..if I had to choose that makes sense to me in that aspect..I would say hmm..both. Cause ur not beating anything, just speeding it up, your younger as u run, but once time catches up ur older.
2007-01-02 14:38:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by * Kittles * 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
You would be 1 hour older, time would stay the same for you. you were running for 1 hour.
2007-01-02 14:38:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by the radioactiveman 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
E=MC^2 So you can't
Energy required = Mass of you * (speed of light)^2
You would be younger in reference to the world if you did not die.
2007-01-02 14:57:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by jbscooby99999 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
And Chuck Norris, too, probably.
Uh...I don't think anyone's gonna start running at the speed of light any time soon.
2007-01-02 14:37:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
that doesn't even make sense... you would be the same age... just running at the speed of light... so instead of going somewhere and making it in an hour you make it in less than a millisecond...
right...
2007-01-02 14:38:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by DR. Connect 2
·
0⤊
2⤋