Because birth defects often appear in "recessive" genes. If one parent has a defective recessive gene but the other has a normal dominant gene, the dominant gene is more likely to prevail so the birth defect doesn't appear.
When the parents are brother and sister, both are likely to have the same defective recessive gene, so there is no normal dominant gene and the child ends up with the recessive defect.
2007-01-02 14:28:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by The answer guy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Many of the abnormal conditions that are genetic in nature are caused by recessive genes, meaning that in order for the disorder to manifest itself both of the genes have to be the recessive one, meaning that each parent contributed a recessive gene. Assuming that the brother and sister came from the same parents (half- brother's and sister's to a degree as well), they would have greater chance to both be carrying the recessive gene, and that would increase the risks of having a child with the disorder greatly (1 in 4 or 25%, I believe).
2007-01-02 14:31:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Steve F 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here's a thirty year old memory from school.
A lot of biological things are made up of two
genes. One of these genes may determine the
phenotype (the expressed trait).
So unrelated Mom and Dad are
Mom = AB
Dad = CD
Bro and Sis are
Bro = AD
SIS = AC
If bro and SIs have a child, the child
could be AA, which if A were not so good, would
be a terrible thing.
If the parents are unrelated the chances of getting
a child with a repeat bad gene are lower.
Thats the simple story.
2007-01-02 14:36:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by farmer 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
He sounds distinctive, yet whats incorrect with distinctive!?!? It sounds to me as though the folk announcing he's strange are merely jealous that he's an clever, mature little boy. playstation My sister thinks my daughter is strange because of the fact she's 3 yrs previous and prefers to take a seat down and draw photos, or examine a e book then do the failings her 7 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous does mutually with play barbies. each and every baby is distinctive, i grew to become right into a 'distinctive' youngster, i used to verify books on extraterrestrial beings and the mystical at 7 years previous!, maximum women of my age have been into pop track or Yo yos lol!. yet i grew as much as be a 'common' individual, i nevertheless rebelled as a young person and did each and every of the familiar stuff. xx
2016-10-06 08:55:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because if there is a recessive, deleterious gene carried by the members of the family, then a child of two members of this family would show the trait.
2007-01-02 14:28:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by kt 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a pretty gross IDEA, but not really. They might pick up some traits that run in the family. (Bad eyesight, etc.) The cases you see where people are mutants are cases where it's generation after generation of inbreeding.
2007-01-02 14:27:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jess H 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
see when chromosones fuse from males and females not from the same family they make a 50 50 gene line.thus making it normal.
however when chromosones fuse from males and females from the same family they make a 100 same gene line.thus making it normal.
good question.
2007-01-02 14:33:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by jack 3
·
0⤊
0⤋