I'm sure Cheney's getting a little itchy now that Saddam got his - no?
2007-01-02 12:56:49 · 8 answers · asked by Dastardly 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Dear Al, sorry you are unable to comprehend english. Good luck.
2007-01-02 13:06:37 · update #1
How about Texas?
2007-01-02 13:03:22 · answer #1 · answered by OldGringo 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Iran for sure. I think it is great Bush got a boogie man off the streets but maybe this time spend little more time on someone that had something to do with 911.
2007-01-02 21:01:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think that China could be next......
but it is little bit difficult...... for the following reason.
Chinese will refuse to "fight"..... therefore.....can you imagine what will happen if an army 200-500 million go to be surround to the US soldiers?
The US in accordance to Geneva convention has to provide food and shelter to POWs. The result will be disastrous. US economy will collapse.
I don't think that it is difficult for US to take china.... but the results will be devastating. They have to "doublethink" this option.:)
2007-01-02 21:17:41 · answer #3 · answered by UncleGeorge 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
How about California, wait, that's not a country, sorry,
don't know of any other country to invade yet, but we'll come up with something.
2007-01-02 21:13:03 · answer #4 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
California.
2007-01-02 21:08:40 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
We don't need no stinkin' evidence.
2007-01-02 21:11:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would love to bash bush here, but your question makes no sense.
Try harder next time.
2007-01-02 20:58:32 · answer #7 · answered by Shaddup Libs 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
You idiots said there were none and we never found WMD's, please be consistent!
2007-01-02 21:04:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋