on Terri Schiavo, so why won't they cancel Senator Tim Johnson's ticket and take him off life support?
2007-01-02 12:13:40 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ahh, another liberal contradiction, stay tuned, they never stop. They must be use to the taste of shoe leather by now, don't you think?
2007-01-02 12:17:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
Because Terri Schiavo was a vegetable and brain dead.
Oh wait yes of course how can we forget Bill Frists expert medical opinion based on 30 seconds of video. The man also thinks Aids is spread through tears so we must believe him.
Oh I am not sure how to answer this I mean you guys are the party of non government interference are you not?
How could you support Bushs interference in the matter?
2007-01-02 12:23:38 · answer #2 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Just because the Schiavo fiasco failed the republican party and the public saw right through it, doesn't mean you have to mad about it. And what station was frothing at the mouth with speculation once Senator Johnson's story broke? That's right, Fox news. Shall we have a convo about Tom De lay's father being taken off life support?
2007-01-02 12:19:03 · answer #3 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Because he's not in a coma and is responsive and can communicate. They're two totally different and unrelated cases. You might want to do your research first.
He suffered from a congenital problem that caused bleeding in his brain. Visit this link to get the statement that shows he's being weaned off of life support and is responsive: http://johnson.senate.gov/~johnson/releases/200612/2006C28A11.html
She was irreversibly brain-damaged after being deprived of oxygen for an extended period of time following a heart attack. By the time of her death, her brain had shrunk to about half it's normal size. Visit this link to get the details and see pictures: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terri_Schiavo
It's not a "libs" issue... it's a knowing what you're talking about issue.
2007-01-02 12:28:42 · answer #4 · answered by Jerry Hayes 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Not touching this. Okay, I lied.
Schiavo as a Republican fiasco? Get it right, bilbo. Schiavo was a Republican moment of pride. And a national disaster.
Only wish Bill Frist would give it a run.
2007-01-02 12:18:17 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because Terri Schiavo didn't have the deciding majority vote in Congress.
2007-01-02 12:16:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Maybe they are getting your morals and becoming pro-life? Why are you comparing a political ploy to a surgery?
2007-01-02 12:33:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
uh... one had no brain activity... the other does...
I realize that Republicans have no real idea about brain activity, based on those they elect and the opinions of the party... so this could be a difficult concept for you to grasp...
2007-01-02 12:26:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
He's not on life support, and he is awake and alert.
His recovery is "exceeding expectations."
Sorry, you're not going to steal back the senate due to illness :)
2007-01-02 12:23:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
are you on life support also?
2007-01-02 12:16:31 · answer #10 · answered by cork 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋