Most of the stuff you hear is anti-war. For instance, in the newspaper today, the headline was "3000 dead in Iraq" - and nothing about President Ford until the second section.
2007-01-02 12:06:26 · 17 answers · asked by Aquilus 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This is because of the years we are living in. I will explain. You see most of the people who run the media or operate it are between the ages of 40 and 60. This is the baby boomer generation. Now I myself are a baby boomer. So I am familiar with what has happened. The baby boomers were brought up in the sixties and seventies. This was a time of radicalisation and the emergence of liberal politics. Now most of the baby boomers didn't really believe in hippydom to it's upmost, but indulged somewhat in such. Then when things began to swing the other way they went into business and work. They joined the rest of society. But they took two things with them. One, the ideas and familiarity of radicalisation and liberal politics. Two, the spoiled indulgent mentality that suited and was a part of their upbringing in the sixties and seventies. Basically , although they sold out, they basically believe in radicalisation and liberal politics. Therefore they seek to enforce this(and it is a very intolerant philosophy) in anything they control or have a part in. Also having taken the lax and cowardly morals of the hippy era with them, they are that way in character. Basically they are cowards. When I used to speak to radicals in the 60s and 70s they would tell me that if an enemy invaded Australia(my country) and raped their wives, mothers, sisters and daughters-they would approach them and say "man I love you- you should not do that- peace man" When you look at such craven cowardness it is no wonder that these vermin do what they are doing.
Also they have brought up their charges(in schools and homes) to be likewise. I was once at the Sydney Domain(a place where free speach in the park is practised every Sunday) and a radical was speaking. He outlined a plan to become teachers, influence the children and indoctrinate them to their way of thinking. This was in the very early 70s. Sure enough, in the next few years, many of them went to university under Whitlam's (the prime minister) free education policy to become just that-teachers. They joined what was know as the teachers federation(the teachers union), influence it and began teaching this politically correct and extreme nonesense. This is another reason why the media is like it is. Because their apprentices are also operating it now as well.
So basically the two reasons why is because of mindless indoctrination for an idiocy and basic moral and physical cowardness and softness. They are really deep down ashamed of themselves and continuously want to justify the stance they have taken.
I am an Australian, and proud of it. America has been our great ally from World War II. They have always stood with us and we with them. Believe me when I say this, most of my country are grateful that your nation has got the courage to do what must be done and to stand by their allies. We are grateful that your nations does not subscribe to the radicals' insane and cowardly doctorine of "man I love you" garbage. Ignore these idiots. They are lunatics crying in the wilderness. Most of your nation and most of the civilized world subscribes to the philosophy of : if these people come to do harm to our loved ones or to other people- blow their heads off and send the sons of bitches where they belong. So that freedom will not perish from the face of the earth. And don't get discouraged. Stand up for what you believe in . I guarrantee- THERE ARE MILLIONS OF US.
2007-01-02 12:37:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋
Actually, while it may be true that most journalists are liberal, their bosses are very conservative, and they make the decisions on what is in the news. The media reported the 3000 dead, not because they are liberal, but because that is what happened. You can actually see the conservative bias in the media especially when they show strikes and protests. They always show the freaks and imbeciles, but not the peaceful parts. There are more examples, but I can't think of them. Just realize though, the people who are in charge of the media all benefit from a Republican controlled government, not a liberal one.
2007-01-02 12:13:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
it somewhat is truly unhappy and pathetic, even yet it somewhat is the Antichrist spirit i think. If everybody is waiting to worship Obama, they're going to be waiting to worship the Antichrist while he comes on the scene and he will and it heavily isn't long. Cherish the time that we ought to continuously be loose for now. I do! Obama seems to be in the back of each and every variety of anti-God issues. The media is afraid to declare something this is politically incorrect, as consistent with Obama. some newshounds have been fired. i understand of one that have been given fired while Clinton grew to become into president. the warmth is on the newshounds greater now than ever. human beings have disappeared mysteriously or been shot down who disagreed with what Obama were attempting to convey forth. possibly they're going to penal complex me now for asserting this. I better close up.
2016-11-25 23:37:01 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
anti war reports is good headline
it help the public to have hope in civilization
most dead people news end in the last pages
2007-01-02 12:27:41 · answer #4 · answered by kimht 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
'3000 Dead in Iraq' is real news, and is not partisan. How is that considered liberal? Are the reporting of facts now considered liberal? What is the matter with you?
2007-01-02 12:17:41 · answer #5 · answered by Webber 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
If it was really biased, then the front page would read "Ford calls Bush an idiot from the grave". But it didn't, and he did.
why are cons so lame in dealing with reality?
why are cons so afraid of hearing anything but bush lies about how great the war is going?
2007-01-02 12:11:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
It is all about money. If the Democrats were in high office and things weren't going well, media would swing right. They are a business.
2007-01-02 12:20:34 · answer #7 · answered by ? 1 · 3⤊ 2⤋
the simple fact is... most of the "news" is negative... no matter what it is...
I mean people don't care about boy scouts saving cats from trees...
so of course, it stands to reason, that most of the war news will be negative...
you think that is liberal bias... in fact they are just telling the bad news... which is what they always do...
2007-01-02 12:16:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
3000 Dead....yawn.
How many do you think it needs to be before it deserves a headline?
2007-01-02 12:14:51 · answer #9 · answered by Patienttraffic 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because liberal people own the liberal media. The only conservative major media outlets are Wall St. Journal and Fox News and they are owned by conservatives. Amazing how the works huh?
2007-01-02 12:15:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋