Do you agree with bush sending 20,000 more troops to Iraq? Why? Do you think America is winning the war?

Answer 1

I totally disagree with this decision because he doesn't know "WHAT THE HELL" he wants to do.... he's is so sad it's pathetic. American is not winning the war it's so obvious, America is losing troops on a daily basis and for what cause? Bush wants money and the power and will stop at nothing to get them both! HE IS A VERY SICK INDIVIDUAL. MORE A COWARD than anything, he is so confused is just sad....Sponge bob would have been a better president. If another republican or democratic makes it next as president, I pray they ask GOD for guidance, instead of getting the "BIG HEAD"

Answer 2

America was suppose to go to war against terrorism. How did Iraq get involved? Simple, Bush merely settled an ongoing feud between his father and Saddam. Iraq has no association with America's war on terrorism except for the terrorism that George Bush is applying. Fear the American government kids, it wants complete power and it won't stop until it gets it. The U.S. government is an entity beast all its own. And it is evil. So, to answer your question, NO - America isn't winning any war. It isn't winning the war on terrorism and it isn't winning the war in Iraq. America can't win any wars anymore for 2 reasons: First, they are always starting the wars and secondly, they never know what war they are fighting. America itself is riddled with ADD.

Answer 3

Of course the United States is winning. The U.S. won that war in the first week. The U.S. is simply cleaning things up and righting the course of the ship like it did after the American Revolution. This has basically been a bloodless war compared to other American-led wars. I agree with the great Senator John McCain, the next President, that more troops must be sent to put the icing on the cake.

Thanks God for President Bush and Prime Minister Blair putting an end to Saddam Hussein, the genocidal despot. They are real men who stand up for what is right even though the Liberal Democrats, Communists, Socialists, Fascists and other evil people of the world were willing to turn a blind eye to people like Saddam and Hitler.

Answer 4

There was barely even a war, we dominated from the beginning.

Guerilla warefare is always hard to deal with. These people do not follow the rules of engaement, they are hanging by a thread and extremely desperate, this is the worst kind of underhanded low level enemy to deal with, because they have no honor and will not accept defeat.

We are merely prolonging occupation in iraq long enough to aid the Iraqis to take care of themselves, now that the old dictator was removed. There will always be violence and trouble in the middle east, there always has been. We are simply setting factors in place to prevent anotherevil dictator from gaining too much power.

of course i agree with 20k more, what ever it takes, unfortunately its our job.

The greatest evil out there is not really even the evil men, the greatest evil are good men who stand by and do nothing.

Who are you again?

Answer 5

More troops sounds good to me. Maybe more than 20,000 more. To defeat the enemy.

Or, I hear we're not letting our current troops fight hard enough. Something about too-limiting "rules of engagement." Maybe we should fight harder, not use more troops. But we should do SOMETHING new.

I don't think we're winning the war, just like we weren't always winning World War Two. But we must win the war. To beat terrorism.

And we can win the war. You want us to win, right?

Answer 6

Yes, we need to send more troops in. If we lose the war, it will be the media that loses it for us. Just like Vietnam. The troops say we are winning the war. But, does anyone listen to them?

Answer 7

Absolutely not. Instead of sending more troops, he should bring home the ones that are already there. There was no reason to invade Iraq and now, the country's infrastructure has been destroyed, people are going without the basis necessities of life and what was once a stable nation has descended into civil war. There is nothing we can do and our presence is making bad matters worse.

The Bush Administration lied about Saddam in order to fool our less intelligent members of Congress into voting in favor of invading Iraq. No good ever comes of actions based on a lie.

Answer 8

I disagree with bush's descision. I strongy believe that America is losing the war. if you look at the statistics, you will see that casualties are at an all time high for both sides. obviously, this means that things are not getting better. it is a CIVIL WAR in Iraq. it may not be your text book case of civil war, but there is no disputing that it is not a civil war. the purpose of a civil war is for a country to battle out its future on its own. ON ITS OWN. that means without interference. we should be pulling back, not pulling out, pulling back slowly.

Answer 9

At this point I'm no longer sure what in the heck we should do now.....and I'm guessing neither does Bush.

Sending more troops seems like a suicide mission to me.

Answer 10

Sure if he is sending his own over there, he dont care about sending every body else kids over there, but if some of his familey had to go the case would be differnt. i bet he would'nt keep them over there so long. his kids should be there also if you susposable care so much about the country, the mothers and fathers that have familey over there dieing every day love there familey also. it just nonsence to me. he is sending our country to hell and ruins fast.