the plane disapears?
no wings found which would have broken off?
no sizeable wreckage all aparently melted?
One hole?
carbon fibre tip of the plain (body being aluminum) goes through 9 feet of steel reinforced concrete?
and it goes on and on ,odviously im talking about the pentagon being hit on 9/11 . what the hell is going there?
and popular mechanics , who expects anyone to beleive all that garbage .
building 7 not hit by a plane ?
had only 2 little fires in it ?
yet only one of three steel framed buildings in history to collapse because of fire ?
then its put out by the guy that owned/leased the complex larry silverstein that he gave the order to pull the building(on video) yet it takes weeks to prime a building with explosives? and it goes on and on
WERE BEING PLAYED RIGHT ?
2007-01-02
10:46:58
·
26 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
kirstie "your so last year dude " lol yeh nice answer lets just forget about it .wtf
2007-01-02
10:50:57 ·
update #1
chuckles whats knowing what a plane does at 350 mile an hour got to do with it ,its like putting a round peg in a square hole it doesnt fit. i give you 5 basic facts out of hundreds and thats all you got . WAKE UP ZOMBIE.
2007-01-02
11:28:46 ·
update #2
yeh thats right ritch its about a 50/50 split good to see there are millions of informed people out there now . though as more and more people wake up they will have to excelerate another catastrophy lets hope major change haappens politicaly.
2007-01-02
12:06:27 ·
update #3
If you want to disagree, then disagree - don't act like an ***.
By last count, the scoffers vs. those looking for answers outside of what the mainstream propagandists pump each day is about evenly divided - here and nationally as well.
It is totally inconceivable that there would be a cover-up over something of this magnitude...just as it is inconceivable that our government knew of the eminent threat of Pearl Harbor being bombed...just as it is inconceivable that there are still allegations of more suspects involved in the Oklahoma City bombing over 10 years later...just as it is inconceivable to think our government would test nukes to see the effects on nearby residents (see Bikini Atoll & Nevada for just 2 examples)...just as it is inconceivable that our government would purposly inject, infect & subject people to every manner of disease, drug & virus all in the name of "safety & security."...just as it is inconceivable that a people would so blindly follow its government like sheeple to the slaughter.
Sounds like Nazi, Germany to me.
"A patriot must be ready to defend his country against his government." Edward Abbey.
2007-01-02 11:33:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Watcher 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
I have watched four or five movies on the internet (infowars stuff etc).
I don't know - when you have professors saying "it is a inside job, with expolsives" publically putting it all on the line, or when you have dead firemen testifying (and the government not releasing the tapes etc) to the fact that they are hearing and seeing explosives (pops) go off- as their last and dying testomoney on earth - or when you see building 7 collapse, which was neither hit by a plane but collapses in the same manner as the twin towers..Or the NIST report which asks more questions than it answers.I have watched all these things, it is impossible to not be at least massively convinced by them.
If i were in a court room on a jury, it would take a hell of a lot of convincing otherwise to convince me I was wrong.. Nobody from the administration has bothered and just throws labels out there like quack or a conspiracy theorist and tells people to "get over it".
Stick with it truth seekers - you may be on to something.
2007-01-03 03:09:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yeah like... SOOO last year. Its not important.
Being analy penetrated by your own goverments not important. Having far reaching implications arnt important.
My house STIILLLL being bombed not important (which its not as im UK, but who knows, maybe the left right bandit terror lithuanian squad might take offence and ill be in the obituaries tomoro).
I still cant believe that ppl wont see SOMETHING wrong is going on here. I cant say what Deffo happened. I can say its power driven madness. I can say all ppl and ppl IN goverment and in the world can do some of the sickest things.
Why not those PEOPLE in power,(the people bits important by the way). Running your country. Talking on TV like a celebrity. Pouting for the cameras. Lying about tax. Why do they suddenly become uncorruptable.
BANG - HEAD - OFF - WALL.
Noone who thinks anti conspiracy come up with anything but crap. "think of the families" "your unpatriotic" "they deserve it" "thats just anti bush lies, left wing, up middle center wing, far right but sort of left wing etc...".
By the way larry silverstein bought the WHOLE complex only 2 months or weeks (im not sure exactly how long) b4 the crash. He only owned Building 7 b4 that. He then took out a MASSSIVE insurance policy. Fraud anyone? All you closed eyed sheep better wake up cos im not shoveling your s**t when it hits the fan. Religious wars bout to kick off big time.
2007-01-02 18:55:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by roujinz3 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
As for the Pentagon, no street lights were hit! They are all intact. As for suggestion that no one knows what a fully fuel laden 757, that is absolute rubbish. The safety testing on aircraft will give most of the answers. There are two parts of a commercial plane that has never been destroyed in a crash, the engines (which tend to snap off) and the landing gear, yet They are nowhere to be seen. Let us not forget Flight 93, there was no sign of engine nor landing gear either in fact, nothing larger than an 8" piece of bone. And if I was a terrorist intent on destroying the Pentagon, I would aim for the "Bulls Eye" centre, not an outer wall. makes no sense at all.
2007-01-02 11:36:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Magnus 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
Strange but in the initial pictures the building, apart from the fire, looks undamaged. I agree where are the marks on the lawn, I doubt that even a professional could put a plane that size into a building with out either hitting the roof or the ground first. Also a large model, when looked at without any other reference points, would look realistic and that would disappear especially if it was filled with explosive and napalm. Strange also that the Trade Towers fell into their foundations, just as they would have done if being professionally demolished.
2007-01-02 18:57:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think Sri Vidya Rajgopalan has given the correct answer. But the Answer is very long. Let me explain you in short. Ram built a Bridge instead of ship because he thought, if in the war with Ravana more army of Varana is required then it will be easy to bring reinforcement through a Bridge Than to send ship.
2016-03-29 05:05:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are another steamed up freak who probably spends all day obsessing about every conspiracy theory under the Sun (and on the internet)
You think the CIA killed Kennedy
You don't believe man walked on the moon
Roujinz3 - you're in the same boat as the freak who posted the question - get a life you complete imbecile
How did I know that?
2007-01-03 15:49:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by fanbelt.throxton 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Don't worry, there ARE some of us out there that can use logic and recognize that this is a conspiracy planned by our government, clear as day.
The guy who owned a gas station nearby when the even happened reported that men came by right after and demanded that he give them his security tapes which would have filmed what really happened. Weird, huh?
2007-01-02 13:56:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Amanda 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I saw a special on that somewhere. Something about the plane disinigrating or something like that, and it has happened before. It showed an example of how it could happen, to disolve the theory that this might be a "set up" or "fake". Unfortunately I cannot remember my source: Dateline NBC or some other random tv show or something like that. It might have just been a special on 9/11. Either way, the questions of what happened or doubts of the truth due nothing to help heal those who lost family members and friends (or were affected in any way) in that wreckage.
2007-01-02 10:53:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by gabound75 5
·
2⤊
5⤋
I don't get this but it sounds like a good opinion anyone else care to explain it to me
2007-01-02 10:50:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by theurbsoweit 2
·
5⤊
0⤋