Iraq is falling apart and President Bush continually claims that Iraq is the center of the War on Terrorism. However Osama Bin Laden was the one who attacked us on September 11th, killing almost 3,000 Americans. President Bush has a fraction of the number of U.S. troops in Afganistan as he does in Iraq, and doesn't seem to really care about whether or not we capture or kill the real Terrorist threat. President Bush constantly claims he wants to protect our Country, yet he has no concern with a man who has proven he is willing to attack us and has shown he has the capabilities to do so. The American people deserve to have Osama Bin Laden caught, and our President doesn't seem to care.
2007-01-02 08:57:58 · 38 answers · asked by Alex 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
he is hidden in somewhere
2007-01-02 08:58:44 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 9⤊ 2⤋
If you take out one terrorist, another will step up and take his place. It isn't the person that must be removed, it is their actions against us. I agree that Bin Laden is a threat, but he is one of many. I don't believe that terrorist threat and the war in Iraq are the same battle. We were lied to-again-about the cause of the war. It seems that politians think we don't have the savvy to figure out what they are doing. As usual I think they are making sure that some have their fingers in the oil pie. The people there don't want us there. They are fighting a war against their neighbors for dominance. They have been fighting this for a long time and it will continue dispite any of our efforts. I used to know a man that had moved here from Albania and considered himself Greek. He talked of the ongoing feelings focused at their neighbors the Turks. He said you never fight as fierce as when you fight your neighbors. He said there will never be a peace. The same with the Croations and Serbians. And the genocide going on in Africa right now. . . Why aren't we helping these people, why just Iraq? Saddam and his sons were horrible people but where and what can the US actually do? Look at Vietnam and how many of our people died over there. Did we win? The only people that won off that war were the people that made money because of the war. What was the movie? Where the people here were challenged to throw open their windows at midnight and yell out, "We're tired of this crap and we're not taking it any more!"
2007-01-02 09:18:21 · answer #2 · answered by towanda 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Osama Bin Laden is hiding in the border of Afghanistan and Pakistan where the terrain is mountainous and treacherous. The United States Marines wanted to hunt for him and Ozawahiri themselves 3 years ago. However, Pakistan President Perez Musharraf forbid the United States from crossing the border because of the political reprisals. President Musharraf has already survived multiple assassination attempts due to his cooperation with the war on terror.
The war Iraq stemmed from Saddam Hussein's continuous violation of the United Nation resolution after the Iraq war in 1991.
The resolution forbids Iraqi fighter jets from flying beyond certain air spaces which he continuously violated. Funded PLO suicide bombings through pilfering the billions of dollars from "The Oil for Food " program that was ran by the Under Secretary of The United Nations (Benet Savon). When it was discovered that he was personally benefitting from this program via payoffs from Saddam, he summarily resigned his post and is now under indictment.
As for the original reason for the invasion which was "Weapons of Mass Destruction"; there were no doubts that Saddam had approximately 11 tons of it which is still unaccounted for. In 1998, after Saddam Hussein odered the United Nation's Weapons Inspectors to leave; President Clinton proclaimed in a speech that Saddam Hussein has yet to account for 11 tons of weapons which he hid all around the country. The size of Iraq is about the size of the state of California. The reason why the weapons inspectors never found any of the weapons back in the late 1990's was due to rather stupid agreement the United Natiosn made with Saddam. The term was that the inspectors must give him 24 hours notice before going to a particular site. This gave him time to move the weapons around. This was also documented by the United Nations report.
An Attorney at work who also works in the Judge Adocate General's Office has already read unclassified intelligence reports that confirms the weapons were promptly moved to Syria weeks after the September 11th attacks.
2007-01-02 09:28:50 · answer #3 · answered by nixdad96 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well first off his name is Usama Bin Laden. Osama is a media lie. They don't think you can handle the fact that his first name starts with USA. I'm not kidding. I don't think the FBI would misspell his name on their ten most wanted poster do you?
He's moving from location to location. He allegedly never sleeps in the same place for more than one night and has constant decoys running around to throw us off his trail. Dude is a crazy smart and very dedicated to his cause and the people love him! Not so much because of what he did to america but what he did to russia when they invaded afganistan. Without Bin Laden they might not have won. Also like his father before him he also renovates mosques (church thingy) for free.
2007-01-02 09:03:23 · answer #4 · answered by mjcalohan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe that the president just made a deal with osama bin laden to make terriost attacks in the first place so that the people will like him better back then and that so that osama bin laden can go free with the deal he made with geogre bush or something. who knows, maybe its something elses too, we may never know unless the **** is out of the toliet for example.
2007-01-02 09:02:41 · answer #5 · answered by Ugly George Bush 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Considering the close oil ties between the Bushites and the Bin Laden's, Osama may well be holed in GB's ranch in Texas.
2007-01-02 09:34:18 · answer #6 · answered by Lou 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Osama is on the run with bad kidneys, living in caves in the mountains. Either that or he's already dead. It can take a long time to find him, the Unibomber eluded athorities for decades.
"War on Terror" is a misnomer. We should call it what it truly is: a "War Against Radical Islam". Iraq is part of the war on radical Islam. Islamists are there fighting, so we are there killing them.
2007-01-02 09:02:26 · answer #7 · answered by Vincent 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I bet no one is interested in capturing Osama Bin Laden including George Bush himself.
2007-01-02 08:59:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bin Laden is hiding under a rock somewhere. The US military and other intelligence agencies are trying to find him. Nothing you say in your statement is correct. Pay attention to the news and not the spin from the left wing main-stream media.
2007-01-02 09:01:36 · answer #9 · answered by regerugged 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
But hey....we got saddam! Osama will live on to be used as a fear tool against the american sheeple!
2007-01-02 09:01:03 · answer #10 · answered by jeb b 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You certainly don't know Bush very well.
We have hundreds of people working to catch Laden.
It's the Democrats that have surrendered.
It was Clinton that saven bin Laden 8 times because he wanted to be buddies.
2007-01-02 09:02:15 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋