2007-01-02 08:28:31 · 10 answers · asked by butterfly w 1 in Social Science ➔ Economics
County side.... i don't see a reason why would they need a car there?
2007-01-02 08:31:37 · answer #1 · answered by Pumpkin P 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think seriously that New York is the only city that has that kind of dynamic, nothing comes close in the U.S. I think some cities in Asia share a similar quality like Tokyo, but I have heard from some friends that live in Seattle that its a very car-free friendly town.
2007-01-02 08:31:47 · answer #2 · answered by jimckinnon 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I lived in Slippery Rock, PA for three years without owning a car. The population is about two thousand...
As long as you live near your work and a grocery store, a car is not necessary.
2007-01-02 08:39:15 · answer #3 · answered by Bugmän 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
San Francisco.
2007-01-02 08:31:57 · answer #4 · answered by Michelle 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are my type of person. Any of the major cities on the Eastern Cooridor, DC, San Franscisco, or Seattle. I am not sure about Portland, but it is pretty earth conscious so I would think it has good transportation.
2007-01-02 08:33:14 · answer #5 · answered by Laughing Libra 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Portland,Or. has a good commuter train system, or Seattle,Wa has one of the best bus systems in the country.
That depends on how much you go around the city you live,really.
2007-01-02 08:53:20 · answer #6 · answered by stbill 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My daughter lives in Bradenton Florida and they have an excellent masstrans (bus) system. They stop every half hour and have bus stops every two blocks.
2007-01-02 08:38:04 · answer #7 · answered by nursesr4evr 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Boston
SF
or anyplace where you have an income and simple needs
2007-01-02 08:37:37 · answer #8 · answered by kurticus1024 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably all the major cities and places where they have a good subway system
2007-01-02 08:30:54 · answer #9 · answered by lilly s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chicago is very good.
2007-01-02 15:26:56 · answer #10 · answered by Freesia 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋