English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Given that he has been (he is "the" responsable of) killing people, why he is not supposed to be judged to death penalty?

"Because he is in the 'good' side". Which one is the good one?

The one which lies in order to get oil almost for free? In order to stablish a liberal government in the Middle East to extract its richness, feeding the USA financial coorporations?

The one which makes war in the name of "our Lord"?

The one which lies during the electoral time, as shown already?

Why, I repeat, why G. W. Bush should not be judged as well as was S. Hussein?

Have a good time!


Ie - young man, 24

2007-01-02 07:53:43 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

10 answers

He will be judged by History

2007-01-02 07:55:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Saddam specifically ordered the murder of thousands upon thousands of innocent people. This is a crime.

President Bush ordered the military into wars, with the authorization to use force from both the Congress and the UN. The invasions were based upon the elimination of brutal tyrannical regimes who supported terrorism and for Iraq, had not, according to world-wide intelligence agencies, dismantled their WMD program per the UN resolutions, as well as myriad other violations of UN resolutions.

Civilians were not targeted, and very few were killed by US forces in conquering the Iraqi military.

I won't get into the vapidity of the "war for oil" meme or the rest of that stupidity. That's just so blatently false and has been a lie for almost 4 years now. Why anybody who claims any intelligence at all would cling to this debunked lie is beyond my comprehension.

Bush did not go to war in the name of "our Lord". This, too, is a pathetic distortion of the truth.

Bush did not lie, either. The anti-Bush wankers have said this like it was a religious chant, but they've never actually proven anything. Hatred for Bush is neither proof or evidence. It is the stuff of lunacy.

It is folly to compare Bush and Saddam. Saddam was a brutal criminal. Bush isn't.

2007-01-02 16:12:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

The lies to get us into this " OIL" war are being exposed. Bush's day will come. He will face Impeachment and should be held accountable in the world court. The world knows what he has done...but until the US media does something but report the party line the mainstream Americans will never figure out what is going on..Americans no longer have Heabus Corpus...we torture people under our control...America is borrowing 10 billion a day from China to support this oil war...who has profited ??? His buddies and family.

2007-01-02 16:16:05 · answer #3 · answered by Frann 4 · 1 3

Are you on crack? He is not responsible for killing anyone. We would not have gone to Iraq if not for that idiot saddam was doing (TO HIS OWN PEOPLE!!!! I might add.) And get oil for free??? Are you kidding me??? If we are getting oil for free, why am I paying 2.25 a gallon?? 6 years ago, I was paying 1.00 a gallon. What do you mean in the name of "our lord"? Isn't that what you terrorists make war for?? Lies during electoral time? Specify please! Maybe these answers will give you your answer.

2007-01-02 16:03:28 · answer #4 · answered by marieandlucaspape 3 · 2 1

Bush did not commit genocide on thousands of his people. Call the war what you may, but our soldiers (God bless them) volunteer to serve their country...how can you even compare the two? Are you crazy? If you think Bush is equal to Sadam- you better move to France, my friend...and thank the troops for defending our freedom, because a comment like that- made in Iraq- would have gotten you killed.

2007-01-02 15:59:36 · answer #5 · answered by Tara 2 · 2 2

Bush may be the worst pres in history, and a moron, and a jackass, but he's no saddam.

On the other hand, if arabs were to invade the US and win, they might very well hold a trial and convict him of starting a prefabricated war that killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians. From my point of view he's a complete ****** and piece of crap, but from theirs, he might be a war crimminal.

He who wins writes history.

2007-01-02 16:45:20 · answer #6 · answered by Tricia 3 · 0 1

This question is so bad and in such poor taste I will not give it an educated answer.

You should leave your brain inside your head instead of taking it out to play with it!

2007-01-02 16:47:02 · answer #7 · answered by Starla_C 7 · 0 0

Because Bush has not tortured and murdered thousands of his own citizens in gas attacks, assasinations and torture prisons.

2007-01-02 15:57:47 · answer #8 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 2 1

simple....bush is american (americans do basically whatever the #$%! they want) and bush is caucasion. bush is living the american dream. american dream: if there is a law broken and you are in politics, just have the law changed or amended as it relates to you. if the law says its wrong, write a new law with an exception clause designed specifically for your violation.

2007-01-02 16:00:00 · answer #9 · answered by jim l 1 · 1 3

Good time trying to translate this mishmash buffoonery.

2007-01-02 16:04:57 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers