How long before the lease is up?
My father has been a landlord for years (I have dabbled) and has been in this same situation numerous times. I remember him trying to take a couple of them to court but to no avail - especially for residential leases. He ended up spending more time and money on attorney fees and other costs. It is a headache, as a judge will typically rule in favor of the tenant and in some cases will end up breaking the lease for you.
A good (and fair) lease will typically have a clause about lease termination and a fee for doing so (usually a month's rent), so that the landlord has some buffer time for a new tenant. If you don't have that in your lease, expect a judge to stick it in for you. UGGHGHH!!!
In this situation, it seems like you'll save yourself a whole lot of time, money and frustration by allowing the tenant to terminate the lease. This will allow you to get a [better] renter in without risking a non-payment situation. Don't think of this as giving up, think of it as a smart business decision. You need the revenue, so get 'em out and move on to a better renter! If this was a commercial lease, my story would be much different.
Here is a snippet from a landlord site I frequent:
"Residential situations differ markedly. In the first place, the amounts at stake are almost always much, much smaller than those in commercial ones. This alone removes most of the justification for a lot of legal pyrotechnics. Residential leases are rarely for more than a term of one year, and the monthly rent installments are usually not very large, relatively speaking. For this reason, aside from the moral indignation of having a tenant walk out on his contractual obligation, there is rarely a sound financial reason for not letting a tenant leave early."
And so goes my father's words of wisdom: "You can't get blood out of a turnip."
If you're not dealing with a solvent tenant, you're better off finding a new one...Hope this helps! Good luck!
2007-01-04 11:18:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Trevor F 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Depending on your state laws, you can usually only charge your tenant as long as it would take to rent to a new tenant. I would suggest that you take the fact that you have a little warning time (presumably, she will need time to get into her new home) and use this time to find a new tenant ASAP.
I have a lot of experience in landlord tenant issues, and I have seen where a landlord tried to take a person to court for months and months worth of rent, but a judge will only require a person to pay for the REASONABLE amount of time it would take to get a new tenant in the unit. (usually only a month or two, depending on the condition of the unit at move out)
If a landlord assumes that they have it all sewed up legally, they'll usually end up with an empty unit, AND no rent. It doesn't look good for a landlord who doesn't try to "mitigate the damages", as it's called, by just assuming the tenant owes the entire balance of the lease and doesn't bother to rent to, or find, another prospective tenant.
Check your lease to see if there are any clauses that address early termination. You might either have a set dollar amount that the tenant would need to pay to no longer be liable, or you have the "mitigate the damages" clause. If you have the latter, you'd better get an ad in the paper. Refusing another tenant, or neglecting to help find another to rent limits your recourse.
People need to realize in this always changing economy that people's lives change. People move, change jobs and marry and divorce so much more than just 5 or 10 years ago. It is very difficult to perfectly orchestrate a home purchase with a lease termination date. Most buyers will either get stuck paying for months on a unit that they no longer live in, or will miss out on the home of their dreams because they think they are bound by a lease. You are entitled to get money for the months that the unit is vacant, within reason, but you are not entitled to "make her pay", so to speak. I sensed from your wording that you're more interested in making her pay than you are in minimizing the problem.
A solution is to follow protocol and try to find a new renter.
A reaction is to "make her pay".
You have to decide what it is you're really after. It might be in your best interest to just give her an early out, negotiate a set amount of money, (say, a month or two) work together to get a new tenant, and let it go.
2007-01-04 12:07:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by BB2 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Trevor and Bryan are absolutely right. You can only get her to pay so much. A judge isn't going to make her pay longer than it would take you to get a new renter. If you drag your feet, a judge will find for the lady and may not make her pay anything at all if he thinks you're being insolent.
If you spend the time you have looking for a new tenant who WANTS to live there, instead of trying to force her into a position where she'll have to pay or stay, causing possible tension, you'd be better off. One thing you don't want is a person who is being forced to do something against their will having the keys to your property. This isn't to say that she'll do damage, but isn't it better to just find a new tenant you're happy with who is happy with the property? It's a safer assumption that someone who wants to be there will look after the place. Plus, you don't want to have it sit vacant any longer than necessary. If the lady moves out, leaving it empty, you open yourself up to possible vandalism and such.
You're best bet is to spend any time and energy on finding a new tenant and try to negotiate a month or two of rent out of her for the time being.
Also, check your state laws before you try to keep her security deposit. In many states, a security deposit can't be kept because she broke a lease. Especially if she pays up to the point that you get another tenant or you agree on a set termination amount. Landlords who try to keep security deposits when they shouldn't usually end up having to pay additional penalties TO the tenant.
2007-01-04 12:52:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by insanatie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If there's a hire, then the renter can stay till it is up and there is no factor you're able to do. leases run with the valuables, no longer the owner. If he's on a month to month hire, then supply him observe earlier the top of this month and he needs to be out via June 30. He could additionally be paying you hire. IF there grew to become into any deposits, the seller could have given you those. YOU!!! will would desire to pay the renter the deposit while they pass out. no longer the seller. the seller screwed you. If he's at the back of on the hire, he owes YOU this money. i could initiate the approach to kick him out now and you do no longer would desire to attend till June 30. initiate the approach NOW.
2016-10-06 08:24:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it should be in the lease agreement what they pay for breaking the lease.
if it is month to month then they give you 30 days notice or pay for the 30 days after they give notice whether they live there or not.
you also should have a security deposit that you can use to repair any damages by the renter
don't worry, just get a new renter or if you do not want the aggrevation, sell the property before housing prices fall further or they eliminate the low tax on long term capital gains.
2007-01-02 07:26:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by brainiac 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Butterscotch is correct. The whole purpose of the lease was to protect the tenant from rent increases and to give you a stable source of income.
Tell her that she's responsible for the rent untill you find new tenants or until her lease has ended. You then deduct any advertising cost from her deposit.
I have to disagree with the "give them a break" attitude. You're running a business. She knew she was buying or thinking of buying a house while she was under a lease. She should be held responsible.
Regards
2007-01-02 19:24:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Have you mentioned renters who break the lease in your
lease agreement? Best to check with a lawyer and find out your rights. As an owner of apartments, I had trouble with people
who wanted to do the same, and laws vary in each state, I'm
sure.
2007-01-02 07:31:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by ladyravenwing2004 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
That is why landlords require a month's rent as security. Do you have a signed lease agreement?If so, what are the terms?
2007-01-02 07:26:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I say give her a break. She is not going to be able to pay you anyway with all the expenses she will have with the house she's going to buy. Keep her deposit and move on. That is part of the risk in being a landlord. Tell her congrats and wish her well.
2007-01-02 07:37:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by kisha w 1
·
2⤊
2⤋
Give her a break you can find new tenants. don't try to get money from her and rent it out also. that's wrong. she probably wont be able to pay you anyways because the cost of home ownership, so what will it do? put a blemish on her credit. it doesn't mater, she still got the new house.
2007-01-02 07:26:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by mike j 2
·
3⤊
1⤋