Well 2010 is south africa, and 2014 is in south america most likey brazil, 2018 they say that North America or Oceania will host it but usa have made no bid to Australia , Canada ,Mexico and the other bidders so far ar China, england and Netherlands and Belgium are doin a joint but but wont be sucseful due to uefa dnt want joint bids anymore. So i would have to go with Australia due to never had 1 or never been on that continent.
2007-01-02 07:04:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Gavin C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
2018 - England - Spain and Portugals economies are in ruins and FIFA dislikes co-hosts. - Holland and Belgium aren't probably backed by their governments, they have commented on the poor hotel facilities and FIFA dislikes co-hosts. - Russia's transport is rubbish (although hosting would improve this), the stadiums are too far away from each other and the crowds are racist. - England have uncovered corruption in the FIFA voting process, have the history as this is the home of football and have hosted well before (1966 World Cup, Euro 1996). If FIFA are sensible (questionable I know), then football is coming home. 2022 - Australia - They know how to host sporting events (2000 Summer Olympics in Sydney, 2003 Rugby World Cup) and take sport very seriously, have the stadiums in place already and Australian Football is a growing domestic league. It will also be Australian winter time so the conditions will be less harsh than in America. - The Americans had it only 28 years prior to when this comes around and I think that is too soon, plus, it isn't even one of their major five sports. - Japan & South Korea only hosted it 20 years prior to when this comes around and again that is too soon, even if they are individual bids. Also South Korea could potentially be involved in the start of World War 3 with North Korea. - Qatar would be a major security worry for me, they may have the financial resources but I refuse to take it as a serious bid. @Tamara Nartichti - Yes, well the 2002 World Cup Finals that were in Japan/South Korea didn't go as smoothly as seemed, they didn't like the political in fighting that went on between the two countries and it's left a bitter taste in FIFA's mouth, in terms of co-hosting, ever since. Having said that Austria/Switzerland did a good job at Euro 2008 so it can be done, although, as I pointed out, there are other reasons why the bids for 2018 shouldn't go to the two co-hosted bids. Nobodies economy seems good, it's just the levels of debt in some countries is much, much greater than others. Spain, for a good example, have SEVEN times the debt that Greece has and the Greek government have basically come out and said the country is broke and have an emergency loan from the IMF (International Monetary Fund). Whilst hosting the World Cup would generate revenue and jobs it is eight years away and they can ill afford spending money they haven't got preparing for it now.
2016-05-23 06:54:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mollie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
As long as the war is going on in Iraq, I believe it won't be anytime soon. Though I wish the FIFA would skip South Africa and come to U.S. It'd be great to see so many players close-up once again and for the last time. And I think I heard Mexico was gonna be World Cup host in 2018. Maybe I can go then!
2007-01-02 06:56:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by ♀VANshee 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No since they already hosted a World Cup in 1994.
2007-01-02 12:21:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by smartmex04 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
2018 World Cup is in North America so maybe the U.S will host it.
2007-01-02 06:48:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
2014 or 2018
2007-01-02 18:47:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by rizwano 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
there is a possibility, u can't really tell right now though
2007-01-02 12:46:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Soccer Lover 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
soon i hope
2007-01-02 06:51:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hope not,they suck!
2007-01-02 07:57:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋