In addition to being the Resident of the White House, George W. Bush is the Military Dictator of Iraq and Afghanistan, and so with all that power , why can't he keep them under his control
2007-01-02 05:21:19 · 11 answers · asked by Sean 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Since 'political science' began it was known that a "benevolent dictatorship" was the best form of government. But as the old saying goes.....power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Being a supreme dictator without commonsense and ability to see past the religious views held by this leader and with incompetent advice given him by those he chose to advize him, will not lead to a orderly occupation or even the well being of the his citizens at home.......as witnessed by the Katrina disaster or other things that are happening within the US. The people spoke in November but too late to solve many of the problems he created - it will take years to re arrange the government and many more years (generations really) to pay off the debt the US has to China and other countries used to finance the war in Iraq and other bad unfair programs.
2007-01-02 05:37:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Sorry,you got that wrong.The invasion of Iraq was illegal according to International law,the war on Afghanistan wasn't.
The situation now is that the legitimate government of Iraq,they are recognized by the UN,whatever you may think of them legally they are the rightful government of Iraq, are asking the US and coalition forces to stay.
Same is true in Afghanistan.
I wouldn't use the term military dictator this loos.
2007-01-02 13:33:52 · answer #2 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Dictator?
Don't dictators sieze absolute control? If he was a dictator there would be no civil unrest in Iraq because he would crush entire neigborhoods like Saddam did.
You are either very uneducated and naive or quite the propaganda machine
2007-01-02 13:28:16 · answer #3 · answered by archimedes_crew 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
what r u talking about. the US army isn't out of control? and you would be surprised many probably 90% of all military choices and decisions are not from the president, its a different war that ANYONE has every fought the closest we have come was the Japanese in their bunker but even then we knew where they were terrorists are different, they look like civilians they act like normal people and then BAM cars and bodies and anything they can rig explode. Do You have any ideas for rooting out the invisible villain?
we arent occupiers we are liberaters in this war.
2007-01-02 13:33:30 · answer #4 · answered by james s 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The British had a few problems here and the US was formed.
Some body forgot to tell the public of those countries that GW was the leader...... What he has told the world is that they are free. Civil freedoms would be to bear arms, free speech, public assembly, The right to pursue happiness is also mentioned there. I think we got them confused now. Confusion is not good for control. You never know where a confused society is going to go.
2007-01-02 13:30:18 · answer #5 · answered by Pablo 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
who gives us the right to dictate to other countries, and if they don't follow our terms, we deem it ok to invade, isn't this the u.s. military dictating to the dictator
2014-11-25 16:32:00 · answer #6 · answered by mshoneyplovehunter 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know if he's the dictator, but he is pretty close...he's not supposed to keep them under control, but don't know why so little progress is being made...
They should be concentrating more on trying to REBUILD those counties...which isn't what they seem to be doing!
2007-01-02 13:26:24 · answer #7 · answered by Shelby 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He is not there to prevent disorder, he is there to preserve it! It suits their purpose of Plunder to have Iraq in disorder keeping everything going on as long as possible. Disorder also serves the purpose of blaming Iran and Syria so they may be bullied as well. This is about who has the power in the region and with bases or surrogates from Cairo to Baghdad, Israel to Afghanistan, BushCo wants to push Iran next. If there was peace in the area, how could we force Iran's hand then? BushCo strategy must have an enemy for our public to focus on, and with peace there can be no enemy.
2007-01-02 13:23:46 · answer #8 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
He uses the Christmas Snow Globe method of management.
Shake it up and then watch all the flakes settle to the bottom.
Go big Red Go
2007-01-02 13:27:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I wondered where Michael Moore has been hiding these days....
2007-01-02 13:32:59 · answer #10 · answered by Chicken Jones 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋