i think it is total bullsh*t that 3 young teenagers were locked away for a crime that they did not commit.
the fact that they were put away without any evidence against them...and have spent so much time in prison (when they are innocent) is crazy.
i think that it is stupid how they can say 'innocent until proven guilty' ,but these 3 young men were put away....damien echols has no reason to be put to death.
i think the stepfather of one of the victims is to blame....as for the fact that they HAVE proof for him, the teeth, why would he get his teeth 'removed' after bite marks were found on the victims? just seemed a bit weird to me...
does anybody agree that they should not be put away for this crime, that they did not commit?
2007-01-02
05:17:57
·
5 answers
·
asked by
karen s
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics