Pushing an Unconstitutional Federal Abortion Ban
Launching an Assault on International Reproductive Rights
Blindly Supporting Abstinence-only Programs
Upholding Phantom Rights for So-called Unborn Victims
Underfunding Title X
Trying to Curb Access to Emergency Contraception (slowing down the FDA approval of Plan B)
2007-01-02 05:05:13 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Don't forget holding the inoculation against HPV hostage for the sake of 'teaching young promiscous girls a lesson' called cervical cancer. That's my favorite. But what do you expect from a non representative government?
2007-01-02 05:12:28 · answer #1 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Michelle the right to have an abortion was never and is not a constitutional right and God forbid it ever becomes a constitutional right.
I've said this before and you being the ninny that you are, are making me say it again.
There are so many new effective birth control methods now and the after unprotective sex drug that back alley abortions won't be necessary. What's needed most is people getting educated that these methods exsist.
And to say blindly supporting Abstinence-only programs. I'm sorry sweety but abstinence is and always will be the best policy. People need to grow up and realize that sex isn't something they should just do willy-nilly with everyone they meet.
2007-01-02 05:19:41 · answer #2 · answered by Mikira 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well the support of abstinence must be working because there has been a drop in teenage pregnancy!
If you are talking about the morning after pill! Guess what it exists in the united states. Given by legal practicing doctors! Who give the option to patients under extreme medical circumstances. They will not give it to Jane Doe because Jane Doe decided to get luck the night before and didn't use any protection.
2007-01-02 05:34:20 · answer #3 · answered by wondermom 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This just adds to the litany of abuses the administration has committed. All based on some misguided Christian Right philosophy. Why in heavens name can't Bush just resign on health grounds so that we can start afresh.
2007-01-02 07:40:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No what is violating human rights is the 30 million babies that have been aborted since the 1970's and an average of 1500 a day. What justification do you have for late term abortions???? What possiable reason is there for one of these???? And it's humane what some of these women go thru afterwards when their guilt sets in? Guilt despite the fact that someone says it legal? Oh don't get me started!
2007-01-02 05:14:58 · answer #5 · answered by Brianne 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Pick and choose. We, the people, are the government so go look in a mirror.
Do your part and vote intelligently.
America Rocks
2007-01-02 05:14:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
This administration has not violated the constitutional and human rights of women and endangered their health. It is actually looking out for the totally helpless little people that will/would die without his fatherly oversight and care for their right to live.
2007-01-02 05:13:52 · answer #7 · answered by lindakflowers 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Are those "reproductive rights" in the Constitution. NOPE!
Since you are so for choice. If you ever do have a baby, I hope you have the decency to never ask for child support. Thank you in advance.
2007-01-02 05:09:17 · answer #8 · answered by netnazivictim 5 · 4⤊ 5⤋
Yes. The facts you stated makes the point.
2007-01-02 05:13:40 · answer #9 · answered by Sean 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
ABSOLUTELY!
But many of the people who would have fought this evil administration were aborted, so they're not here to help you.
Oh well . . .
;)
2007-01-02 05:17:59 · answer #10 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋