2007-01-02 03:07:04 · 17 answers · asked by Mr. Mister 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
The catholic church had a financial connection with Saddam. He has always been idolized by the pope. The catholics believe Saddam should have been allowed to migrate to Rome and be an advisor to the Nazi pope.
With love in Christ.
2007-01-03 21:10:18 · answer #1 · answered by imacatlick2 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The short answer is sheer CRASS STUPIDITY!
Whether Saddam's hanging was a crime may legitimately be debated, but there can be no doubt that the manner of it was a folly.
Humiliating ones enemies when they are down is absolutely no way to make peace - and Saddam was a hero figure to many people. Such will not like the way things were done. He was a soldier (albeit not a very professional one) and the Commander-in-Chief of his countries armed forces. He should have been shown the FORMAL military courtesies - and his request that his execution be by firing squad should have been granted. By treating him with formal respect appropriate to his office and uniform - even if it is held that he did not deserve it as a person - would have been a courtesy to his followers.
Tales of his executioners dancing a jig around his corpse will only exacerbate hatred.
2007-01-02 03:19:28 · answer #2 · answered by Tony B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its more or less what was going to happen to a man of that satire and with an international hagging what happened to say lethal injection or something not so whats the word primitive maybe any way a circus lead by the head clown you knew it was going to happen and now that there is a bad video leaked its making things worse
2007-01-02 03:14:20 · answer #3 · answered by Lab Runner 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was an animal. Human rights of the people he had killed in horrible ways. He was a world known Bad Guy, it was NEWS. Do you think his trial was a circus? The world wanted to know & see. It's not a perfect place. Sorry. I hope this helped you understand.
2007-01-02 03:24:24 · answer #4 · answered by Blues Man 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No one or no government can guarantee the behavior of people to suit their liking. Thats pretty much what Saddam got hanged for trying to do.
2007-01-02 03:18:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The only subversion of human rights that occurred as far as I can see is that some people got away with photographing Saddam's execution with their cell phones. Considering how barbaric Saddam was, this seems to me a very slight subversion.
2007-01-02 03:14:53 · answer #6 · answered by $Sun King$ 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
i could have lots favorite that Saddam Hussein stood trial interior the Hague for Crimes against Humanity so as that each and every person his atrocities could be out interior the open, and the judicial technique could have not looked one in each and every of those charade. Judges and legal experts does no longer ought to difficulty approximately being murdered, due technique could have been accompanied. i'm no longer on my own in this. most of the victims, incredibly Kurds whose kin have been exterminated interior the genocide of Anfal, could have needed their memories to be heard through the international, fairly than what has been a politically-inspired quickie trial and execution based in basic terms on the killing of one hundred Shi'ites in a single village after a failed tried political assassination. Many commentators, inclusive of a pair in u . s . of america, experience that the Bush administration needed to eliminate Saddam to conceal up the U. S. government's complicity in his conflict crimes, distinctly while the Reagan and Bush 40-one administrations stood through and not in basic terms permit those crimes happen, yet refused to impose sanctions on Iraq afterwards. there is likewise the sensation that regardless of the undeniable fact that Saddam Hussein ought to have been judged harshly and go through the main extreme penalty for his atrocities, that the way lawsuits have been carried out grew to become into greater equivalent to a lynch-mob than a homicide trial. As to the execution itself, human rights legal experts in different international places like Malaysia the place execution is through unbelievable, that the Iraqis did no longer use the international over known techniques of weight v rope length ratios, incorrect hooding (or the failure to hood), to no longer point out the completely unacceptable taunting of Saddam during his execution and the huge, rebellious, aim audience invited to attend. Executions in different "civilised" international places like Malaysia are in basic terms witnessed through a small team of people. no count number what each and every individual's perspectives of Saddam Hussein, nor of the dying penalty, nor of unbelievable as a fashion of execution, the Iraqis did this entire element very badly and made themselves seem fairly like barbarians interior the eyes of something of the international - even the Muslim international.
2016-11-25 22:28:37 · answer #7 · answered by prochnow 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Looks to me like the Iraqi's turned it into a circus!
2007-01-02 03:09:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
It may have been viewed to some in the World as an act of of vengeance, and greed", while, others (mostly Iraqis) supported it as "justice", for a tyrant that was unstable morally.
2007-01-02 03:14:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
It just seemed like the usual Middle East execution and funeral....shouting, dragging coffins in the back of pick up trucks. Classy act for sure.
2007-01-02 03:14:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋